Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philippe Ingels

dblp:46/1445 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › group communication
atomic broadcast
0.012001
Consensus-Based Fault-Tolerant Total Order Multicast · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Distributed systems
consensus
0.012001
Consensus-Based Fault-Tolerant Total Order Multicast · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012001
Consensus-Based Fault-Tolerant Total Order Multicast · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Distributed systems › group communication
ordered multicast
0.012001
Consensus-Based Fault-Tolerant Total Order Multicast · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Distributed systems › group communication
reliable multicast
0.012001
Consensus-Based Fault-Tolerant Total Order Multicast · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

correctness proof · 0.0consensus-based protocol design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Transactions on Partially Replicated Data Based on Reliable and Atomic Multicasts
abstract
We focus on a partial data replication model in which each object is made fault-tolerant by a process group. We propose a replication control protocol that provides transaction properties based both on reliable and atomic multicast primitives and a two phase locking protocol. Furthermore, we propose two deadlock prevention rules to obtain two variants of the base protocol, one that favors the execution of transaction write operations over read operations and another one that does the contrary, favoring read over write. The latter variant ensures that read-only transactions are never aborted. Both protocols ensure that all transactions are not aborted by deadlock prevention rules.
Udo Fritzke Jr., Philippe Ingels
ICDCS2
2001 Consensus-Based Fault-Tolerant Total Order Multicast
abstract
While total order broadcast (or atomic broadcast) primitives have received a lot of attention, this paper concentrates on total order multicast to multiple groups in the context of asynchronous distributed systems in which processes may suffer crash failures. "Multicast to Multiple Groups" means that each message is sent to a subset of the process groups composing the system, distinct messages possibly having distinct destination groups. "Total Order" means that all message deliveries must be totally ordered. This paper investigates a consensus-based approach to solve this problem and proposes a corresponding protocol to implement this multicast primitive. This protocol is based on two underlying building blocks, namely, uniform reliable multicast and uniform consensus. Its design characteristics lie in the two following properties. The first one is a minimality property, more precisely, only the sender of a message and processes of its destination groups have to participate in the total order multicast of the message. The second property is a locality property: No execution of a consensus has to involve processes belonging to distinct groups (i.e., consensus is executed on a "per group" basis). This locality property is particularly useful when one is interested in using the total order multicast primitive in large-scale distributed systems. In addition to a correctness proof, an improvement that reduces the cost of the protocol is also suggested.
Udo Fritzke Jr., Philippe Ingels, Achour Mostéfaoui, Michel Raynal
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.2
1998 Fault-Tolerant Total Order Multicast to Asynchronous Groups
abstract
While Total Order Broadcast (or Atomic Broadcast) primitives have received a lot of attention, the paper concentrates on Total Order Multicast to Multiple Groups in the context of asynchronous distributed systems in which processes may suffer crash failures. "Multicast to Multiple Groups" means that each message is sent to a subset of the process groups composing the system, distinct messages possibly having distinct destination groups. "Total Order" means that all message deliveries must be totally ordered. The paper proposes a protocol for such a multicast primitive. This protocol is based on two underlying building blocks, namely, Uniform Reliable Multicast and Uniform Consensus. Its design characteristics lie in the two following properties. The first one is a minimality property, more precisely, only the sender of a message and processes of its destination groups have to participate in the multicast of the message. The second property is a locality property: no execution of a consensus has to involve processes belonging to distinct groups (i.e., consensus are executed on a "per group" basis). This locality property is particularly useful when one is interested in using the Total Order Multicast primitive in large scale distributed systems. An improvement that reduces the cost of the protocol is also suggested.
Udo Fritzke Jr., Philippe Ingels, Achour Mostéfaoui, Michel Raynal
SRDS2