Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Raymond D. Rimey

dblp:46/163 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
3D vision · 28% Robot navigation and mapping · 28% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.021994
Control of selective perception using bayes nets and decision theory · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1994
Where to Look Next Using a Bayes Net: Incorporating Geometric Relations · ECCV 1992
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
decision theory
0.011994
Control of selective perception using bayes nets and decision theory · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1994
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › geometric model fitting
geometric primitive fitting
0.021988
A maximum-likelihood approach to segmenting range data · IEEE J. Robotics Autom. 1988
A maximum likelihood approach to segmenting range data · ICRA 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
range image segmentation
0.021988
A maximum-likelihood approach to segmenting range data · IEEE J. Robotics Autom. 1988
A maximum likelihood approach to segmenting range data · ICRA 1988
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
active vision
0.011992
Task-specific utility in a general Bayes net vision system · CVPR 1992
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › view planning
next-best-view planning
0.011992
Where to Look Next Using a Bayes Net: Incorporating Geometric Relations · ECCV 1992
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual navigation
0.011992
Where to Look Next Using a Bayes Net: Incorporating Geometric Relations · ECCV 1992
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model
0.011991
Controlling eye movements with hidden Markov models · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1991
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
visual sequence learning
0.011991
Sequences, structure, and active vision · CVPR 1991
Computer vision › 3D vision
range image processing
0.011988
A maximum-likelihood approach to segmenting range data · IEEE J. Robotics Autom. 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
surface reconstruction
0.011988
A maximum-likelihood approach to segmenting range data · IEEE J. Robotics Autom. 1988
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
active perception
0.011994
Control of selective perception using bayes nets and decision theory · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1994
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.011992
Task-specific utility in a general Bayes net vision system · CVPR 1992
Wearable and physiological sensing
eye tracking
0.011991
Controlling eye movements with hidden Markov models · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian network · 0.0hidden markov model · 0.0decision theory · 0.0maximum likelihood estimation · 0.0maximum expected utility · 0.0hierarchical segmentation · 0.0hierarchical clustering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Recognizing wide-area and process-type activities
abstract
New methods are presented to model, visualize and automatically recognize wide-area activities, which essentially are activities that span large areas (such as a facility or urban neighborhood) and that usually span long time intervals (such as hours and weeks). We introduce the no-go topology method and the chokepoint-observation interaction method, and then show how new algorithms can be built on them to recognize a category of wide-area activity, called process-type activities. Experimental results are presented for recognizing a manufacturing process observed via persistent GMTI sensor data. Then we present experimental results illustrating how an interesting activity can be detected as a deviation from a learned wide-area normalcy model, and how new widearea activity patterns can be discovered using simple visualizations of the results. One objective of this paper is to demonstrate that it is theoretically possible to recognize wide-area and process-type activities in built-up environments using GMTI data. The results presented here use somewhat ideal sensor data (small positional error ellipses, continuous GMTI observations, repetitive activities) and our approach is to move toward more operationally realistic data.
Raymond D. Rimey, William A. Hoff
FUSION1
1994 Control of selective perception using bayes nets and decision theory
Raymond D. Rimey
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
1992 Task-specific utility in a general Bayes net vision system
abstract
TEA is a task-oriented computer vision system that uses Bayes nets and a maximum expected-utility decision rule to choose a sequence of task-dependent and opportunistic visual operations on the basis of their cost and (present and future) benefit. The authors discuss technical problems regarding utilities, present TEA-1's utility function (which approximates a two-step lookahead), and compare it to various simpler utility functions in experiments with real and simulated scenes.>
Raymond D. Rimey
CVPR1
1992 Where to Look Next Using a Bayes Net: Incorporating Geometric Relations
Raymond D. Rimey
ECCV1
1991 Sequences, structure, and active vision
abstract
Sequences of symbols generated by a visual and action sequence provide information about the natural structure of the world. HMMs (hidden Markov models) provide one way to learn (recover), store, produce, manipulate, and analyze both visual sequences and associated knowledge structures for computer vision.>
Raymond D. Rimey
CVPR1
1991 Controlling eye movements with hidden Markov models
Raymond D. Rimey
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
1988 A maximum likelihood approach to segmenting range data
abstract
The problem of segmenting a range of image into homogeneous regions, in each of which the range data corresponds to a different surface, is discussed. A maximum-likelihood (ML) segmentation is sought. As most manufactured parts are well approximated by patches of planes, cylinders, and spheres, these three simple surfaces are considered to be the only surfaces in the image. The basic approach to segmentation is to divide the range image into windows, classify each window as a particular surface primitive, and group like windows into surface regions. Grouping windows of the same surface types is cast as a weighted ML clustering problem. Mixed windows are segmented using a ML hierarchical segmentation algorithm. The resulting regions and their associated ML surface parameter and boundary estimates can then be used to perform ML object position estimation and matching. A similar approach is taken for segmenting visible-light images of Lambertian objects illuminated by a point source at infinity.>
Fernand S. Cohen, Raymond D. Rimey
ICRA2
1988 A maximum-likelihood approach to segmenting range data
abstract
The problem of segmenting a range image into homogeneous regions in each of which the range data correspond to a different surface is considered. The segmentation sought is a maximum-likelihood (ML) segmentation. Only planes, cylinders, and spheres are considered as presented in the image. The basic approach to segmentation is to divide the range image into windows, classify each window as a particular surface primitive, and group like windows into surface regions. Mixed windows are detected by testing the hypothesis that a window is homogeneous. Homogeneous windows are classified according to a generalized likelihood ratio test which is computationally simple and incorporates information from adjacent windows. Grouping windows of the same surface types is cast as a weighted ML clustering problem. Finally, mixed windows are segmented using an ML hierarchical segmentation algorithm. A similar approach is taken for segmenting visible-light images of Lambertian objects illuminated by a point source at infinity.>
Raymond D. Rimey, Fernand S. Cohen
IEEE J. Robotics Autom.1
1985 Segmentation of three dimensional range data
abstract
A new approach to segmentation of range image data into quadric surfaces is treated here. The segmentation consists of three stages. First, an initial segmentation produces coarse surface regions classed as plane, cylinder, or sphere. The algorithm operates on contours, or 2D slices, of the data rather than the 3D range image data. Second, constrained surface fitting is used to obtain surface parameter estimates for each segmented region. And third, a high accuracy segmentation results in both a high resolution boundary between surface regions and accurate quadric surface parameters. The algorithm is hierarchical and works in stages from low to high image resolution while updating surface parameter estimates at each stage. Experimental results with synthetic and real range images are given.
Fernand S. Cohen, Raymond D. Rimey, Jean-François Cayula
ICASSP2