Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Hirotoshi Taira

dblp:46/2097 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
predicate-argument structure
0.112008
A Japanese Predicate Argument Structure Analysis using Decision Lists · EMNLP 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.012004
Maximal Margin Labeling for Multi-Topic Text Categorization · NIPS 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision lists · 0.1multi-class classification · 0.0maximal margin criterion · 0.0label prototype prior · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 BaseNP Supersense Tagging for Japanese Texts
Hirotoshi Taira, Sen Yoshida, Masaaki Nagata
PACLIC1
2008 A Japanese Predicate Argument Structure Analysis using Decision Lists
Hirotoshi Taira, Sanae Fujita, Masaaki Nagata
EMNLP1
2004 Maximal Margin Labeling for Multi-Topic Text Categorization
abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of statistical learning for multi- topic text categorization (MTC), whose goal is to choose all relevant top- ics (a label) from a given set of topics. The proposed algorithm, Max- imal Margin Labeling (MML), treats all possible labels as independent classes and learns a multi-class classifier on the induced multi-class cate- gorization problem. To cope with the data sparseness caused by the huge number of possible labels, MML combines some prior knowledge about label prototypes and a maximal margin criterion in a novel way. Experi- ments with multi-topic Web pages show that MML outperforms existing learning algorithms including Support Vector Machines. 1 Multi-topic Text Categorization (MTC) This paper addresses the problem of learning for multi-topic text categorization (MTC), whose goal is to select all topics relevant to a text from a given set of topics. In MTC, multiple topics may be relevant to a single text. We thus call a set of topics label, and say that a text is assigned a label, not a topic. In almost all previous text categorization studies (e.g. [1, 2]), the label is predicted by judging each topic’s relevance to the text. In this decomposition approach, the features specific to a topic, not a label, are regarded as important features. However, the approach may result in inefficient learning as we will explain in the following example. Imagine an MTC problem of scientific papers where quantum computing papers are as- signed multi-topic label “quantum physics (QP) & computer science (CS)”. (QP and CS are topics in this example.) Since there are some words specific to quantum computing such as “qbit1”, one can say that efficient MTC learners should use such words to assign label QP & CS. However, the decomposition approach is likely to ignore these words since they are only specific to a small portion of the whole QP or CS papers (there are many more QP and CS papers than quantum computing papers), and therefore are not discriminative features for either topic QP or CS. 1Qbit is a unit of quantum information, and frequently appears in real quantum computing litera- tures, but rarely seen in other literatures. Symbol x(∈ Rd) t1, t2, . . . , tl T L, λ(⊂ T ) L[j] Λ(= 2T ) {(xi, Li)}m i=1 Meaning A document vector Topics The set of all topics A label The binary representation of L. 1 if tj ∈ L and 0 otherwise. The set of all possible labels Training samples
Hideto Kazawa, Tomonori Izumitani, Hirotoshi Taira, Eisaku Maeda
NIPS3
2001 Text Categorization Using Transductive Boosting
Hirotoshi Taira, Masahiko Haruno
ECML1