Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kun Gao 0003
dblp:46/2802-3
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8644-2157ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 92% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 4% Representation and self-supervised learning · 4% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic programming
inductive logic programming |
3.0 | 4 | 2025 | Differentiable Rule Induction from Raw Sequence Inputs · ICLR 2025 A differentiable first-order rule learner for inductive logic programming · Artif. Intell. 2024 A differentiable first-order rule learner for inductive logic programming (Abstract Reprint) · IJCAI 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › rule learning
differentiable rule learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Differentiable Rule Induction from Raw Sequence Inputs · ICLR 2025 A differentiable first-order rule learner for inductive logic programming · Artif. Intell. 2024 |
Program synthesis and code generation
rule learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Rule Induction from Raw Sequence Inputs · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic programming › inductive logic programming
first-order rule learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning First-Order Rules with Differentiable Logic Program Semantics · IJCAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning First-Order Rules with Differentiable Logic Program Semantics · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Rule Induction from Raw Sequence Inputs · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 1.7differentiable clustering · 1.7differentiable first-order rule learning · 0.8propositionalization · 0.6neural network constraint functions · 0.6gradient descent · 0.6differentiable logic program semantics · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differentiable Rule Induction from Raw Sequence InputsabstractRule learning-based models are widely used in highly interpretable scenarios due to their transparent structures. Inductive logic programming (ILP), a form of machine learning, induces rules from facts while maintaining interpretability. Differentiable ILP models enhance this process by leveraging neural networks to improve robustness and scalability. However, most differentiable ILP methods rely on symbolic datasets, facing challenges when learning directly from raw data. Specifically, they struggle with explicit label leakage: The inability to map continuous inputs to symbolic variables without explicit supervision of input feature labels. In this work, we address this issue by integrating a self-supervised differentiable clustering model with a novel differentiable ILP model, enabling rule learning from raw data without explicit label leakage. The learned rules effectively describe raw data through its features. We demonstrate that our method intuitively and precisely learns generalized rules from time series and image data. Kun Gao 0003, Katsumi Inoue, Yongzhi Cao, Hanpin Wang |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | A differentiable first-order rule learner for inductive logic programming (Abstract Reprint)
Kun Gao 0003, Katsumi Inoue, Yongzhi Cao, Hanpin Wang |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | A differentiable first-order rule learner for inductive logic programming
Kun Gao 0003, Katsumi Inoue, Yongzhi Cao, Hanpin Wang |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning First-Order Rules with Differentiable Logic Program SemanticsabstractLearning first-order logic programs (LPs) from relational facts which yields intuitive insights into the data is a challenging topic in neuro-symbolic research. We introduce a novel differentiable inductive logic programming (ILP) model, called differentiable first-order rule learner (DFOL), which finds the correct LPs from relational facts by searching for the interpretable matrix representations of LPs. These interpretable matrices are deemed as trainable tensors in neural networks (NNs). The NNs are devised according to the differentiable semantics of LPs. Specifically, we first adopt a novel propositionalization method that transfers facts to NN-readable vector pairs representing interpretation pairs. We replace the immediate consequence operator with NN constraint functions consisting of algebraic operations and a sigmoid-like activation function. We map the symbolic forward-chained format of LPs into NN constraint functions consisting of operations between subsymbolic vector representations of atoms. By applying gradient descent, the trained well parameters of NNs can be decoded into precise symbolic LPs in forward-chained logic format. We demonstrate that DFOL can perform on several standard ILP datasets, knowledge bases, and probabilistic relation facts and outperform several well-known differentiable ILP models. Experimental results indicate that DFOL is a precise, robust, scalable, and computationally cheap differentiable ILP model. Kun Gao 0003, Katsumi Inoue, Yongzhi Cao, Hanpin Wang |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning from interpretation transition using differentiable logic programming semantics
Kun Gao 0003, Hanpin Wang, Yongzhi Cao, Katsumi Inoue |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |