Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tae-Geon Kim

dblp:46/3289 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Computational social science and digital humanities · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulatory network
0.112008
Evolutionary design principles of modules that control cellular differentiation: consequences for hysteresis and multistationarity · Bioinform. 2008
Computational social science and digital humanities › network science
network evolution
0.112008
Evolutionary design principles of modules that control cellular differentiation: consequences for hysteresis and multistationarity · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network topology analysis · 0.1evolutionary simulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Evolutionary design principles of modules that control cellular differentiation: consequences for hysteresis and multistationarity
abstract
MOTIVATION: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) govern cellular differentiation processes and enable construction of multicellular organisms from single cells. Although such networks are complex, there must be evolutionary design principles that shape the network to its present form, gaining complexity from simple modules. RESULTS: To isolate particular design principles, we have computationally evolved random regulatory networks with a preference to result either in hysteresis (switching threshold depending on current state), or in multistationarity (having multiple steady states), two commonly observed dynamical features of GRNs related to differentiation processes. We have analyzed the resulting evolved networks and compared their structures and characteristics with real GRNs reported from experiments. CONCLUSION: We found that the artificially evolved networks have particular topologies and it was notable that these topologies share important features and similarities with the real GRNs, particularly in contrasting properties of positive and negative feedback loops. We conclude that the structures of real GRNs are consistent with selection to favor one or other of the dynamical features of multistationarity or hysteresis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Junil Kim, Tae-Geon Kim, Sung Hoon Jung, Jeong-Rae Kim, Taesung Park, Pat Heslop-Harrison, Kwang-Hyun Cho
Bioinform.2