EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mads Gregers Jæger
dblp:46/3850
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 77% Usability and user experience research · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interaction techniques and input
in-vehicle interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems · CHI 2008 |
Usability and user experience research
driving performance |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems · CHI 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
eye glance analysis · 0.1empirical evaluation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systemsabstractCar drivers are nowadays offered a wide array of in-vehicle systems i.e. route guidance systems, climate controls, music players. Such in-vehicle systems often require the driver's visual attention, but visual workload has shown significant less eyes-on-the-road time and affects driving performance. In this paper, we illustrate and compare three different interaction techniques for in-vehicle systems. We refer to them as tactile, touch, and gesture interaction. The focus of the techniques is the effects on drivers while driving cars. We evaluated the interaction techniques with 16 subjects in two settings. Our results showed that gesture interaction has a significant effect on the number of driver eye glances especially eye fixations of more seconds. However, gesture interaction still required rapid eye glances for hand/eye coordination. On the other hand, touch interaction leads to fast and efficient task completion while tactile interaction seemed inferior to the two other interaction techniques. Kenneth Majlund Bach, Mads Gregers Jæger, Mikael B. Skov, Nils Gram Thomassen |
CHI | 2 |