Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Robert Kohn

dblp:46/4172 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 91% Trustworthy machine learning · 9%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.912025
ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
directed acyclic graph learning
0.912025
ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
structured variational inference
0.912025
ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.912025
ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.822020
Spectral Subsampling MCMC for Stationary Time Series · ICML 2020
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Energy Conserving Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
The Contextual Lasso: Sparse Linear Models via Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
sparse linear model
0.712023
The Contextual Lasso: Sparse Linear Models via Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.522020
Spectral Subsampling MCMC for Stationary Time Series · ICML 2020
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Energy Conserving Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
scalable bayesian inference
0.412020
Spectral Subsampling MCMC for Stationary Time Series · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
hamiltonian monte carlo
0.412019
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Energy Conserving Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.112019
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Energy Conserving Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation
0.122003
Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes · ICCV 1998
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference
0.012003
Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.012003
Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Geometric modeling and processing
self-similarity
0.011998
Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes · ICCV 1998
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching
0.011998
Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes · ICCV 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 0.9projection · 0.9acyclicity constraint · 0.9control variates · 0.8projection layer · 0.7lasso regularization · 0.7deep neural network · 0.7frequency-domain subsampling · 0.4coreset construction · 0.4gibbs sampling · 0.4variational formulation · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic Graphs
abstract
Directed acyclic graph (DAG) learning is a central task in structure discovery and causal inference. Although the field has witnessed remarkable advances over the past few years, it remains statistically and computationally challenging to learn a single (point estimate) DAG from data, let alone provide uncertainty quantification. We address the difficult task of quantifying graph uncertainty by developing a Bayesian variational inference framework based on novel, provably valid distributions that have support directly on the space of sparse DAGs. These distributions, which we use to define our prior and variational posterior, are induced by a projection operation that maps an arbitrary continuous distribution onto the space of sparse weighted acyclic adjacency matrices. While this projection is combinatorial, it can be solved efficiently using recent continuous reformulations of acyclicity constraints. We empirically demonstrate that our method, ProDAG, can outperform state-of-the-art alternatives in both accuracy and uncertainty quantification.
Ryan Thompson, Edwin V. Bonilla, Robert Kohn
NeurIPS3
2024 Contextual Directed Acyclic Graphs
abstract
Estimating the structure of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) from observational data remains a significant challenge in machine learning. Most research in this area concentrates on learning a single DAG for the entire population. This paper considers an alternative setting where the graph structure varies across individuals based on available "contextual" features. We tackle this contextual DAG problem via a neural network that maps the contextual features to a DAG, represented as a weighted adjacency matrix. The neural network is equipped with a novel projection layer that ensures the output matrices are sparse and satisfy a recently developed characterization of acyclicity. We devise a scalable computational framework for learning contextual DAGs and provide a convergence guarantee and an analytical gradient for backpropagating through the projection layer. Our experiments suggest that the new approach can recover the true context-specific graph where existing approaches fail.
Ryan Thompson, Edwin V. Bonilla, Robert Kohn
AISTATS3
2023 The Contextual Lasso: Sparse Linear Models via Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Sparse linear models are one of several core tools for interpretable machine learning, a field of emerging importance as predictive models permeate decision-making in many domains. Unfortunately, sparse linear models are far less flexible as functions of their input features than black-box models like deep neural networks. With this capability gap in mind, we study a not-uncommon situation where the input features dichotomize into two groups: explanatory features, which are candidates for inclusion as variables in an interpretable model, and contextual features, which select from the candidate variables and determine their effects. This dichotomy leads us to the contextual lasso, a new statistical estimator that fits a sparse linear model to the explanatory features such that the sparsity pattern and coefficients vary as a function of the contextual features. The fitting process learns this function nonparametrically via a deep neural network. To attain sparse coefficients, we train the network with a novel lasso regularizer in the form of a projection layer that maps the network's output onto the space of $\ell_1$-constrained linear models. An extensive suite of experiments on real and synthetic data suggests that the learned models, which remain highly transparent, can be sparser than the regular lasso without sacrificing the predictive power of a standard deep neural network.
Ryan Thompson, Amir Dezfouli, Robert Kohn
NeurIPS3
2020 Spectral Subsampling MCMC for Stationary Time Series
abstract
Bayesian inference using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) on large datasets has developed rapidly in recent years. However, the underlying methods are generally limited to relatively simple settings where the data have specific forms of independence. We propose a novel technique for speeding up MCMC for time series data by efficient data subsampling in the frequency domain. For several challenging time series models, we demonstrate a speedup of up to two orders of magnitude while incurring negligible bias compared to MCMC on the full dataset. We also propose alternative control variates for variance reduction based on data grouping and coreset constructions.
Robert Salomone, Matias Quiroz, Robert Kohn, Mattias Villani, Minh-Ngoc Tran
ICML3
2019 Variance reduction properties of the reparameterization trick
abstract
The reparameterization trick is widely used in variational inference as it yields more accurate estimates of the gradient of the variational objective than alternative approaches such as the score function method. Although there is overwhelming empirical evidence in the literature showing its success, there is relatively little research exploring why the reparameterization trick is so effective. We explore this under the idealized assumptions that the variational approximation is a mean-field Gaussian density and that the log of the joint density of the model parameters and the data is a quadratic function that depends on the variational mean. From this, we show that the marginal variances of the reparameterization gradient estimator are smaller than those of the score function gradient estimator. We apply the result of our idealized analysis to real-world examples.
Ming Xu 0015, Matias Quiroz, Robert Kohn, Scott A. Sisson
AISTATS3
2019 Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Energy Conserving Subsampling
abstract
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) samples efficiently from high-dimensional posterior distributions with proposed parameter draws obtained by iterating on a discretized version of the Hamiltonian dynamics. The iterations make HMC computationally costly, especially in problems with large data sets, since it is necessary to compute posterior densities and their derivatives with respect to the parameters. Naively computing the Hamiltonian dynamics on a subset of the data causes HMC to lose its key ability to generate distant parameter proposals with high acceptance probability. The key insight in our article is that efficient subsampling HMC for the parameters is possible if both the dynamics and the acceptance probability are computed from the same data subsample in each complete HMC iteration. We show that this is possible to do in a principled way in a HMC-within-Gibbs framework where the subsample is updated using a pseudo marginal MH step and the parameters are then updated using an HMC step, based on the current subsample. We show that our subsampling methods are fast and compare favorably to two popular sampling algorithms that use gradient estimates from data subsampling. We also explore the current limitations of subsampling HMC algorithms by varying the quality of the variance reducing control variates used in the estimators of the posterior density and its gradients.
Khue-Dung Dang, Matias Quiroz, Robert Kohn, Minh-Ngoc Tran, Mattias Villani
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2003 Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes
abstract
Representing shapes in a compact and informative form is a significant problem for vision systems that must recognize or classify objects. We describe a compact representation model for two-dimensional (2D) shapes by investigating their self-similarities and constructing their shape axis trees (SA-trees). Our approach can be formulated as a variational one (or, equivalently, as MAP estimation of a Markov random field). We start with a 2D shape, its boundary contour, and two different parameterizations for the contour (one parameterization is oriented counterclockwise and the other clockwise). To measure its self-similarity, the two parameterizations are matched to derive the best set of one-to-one point-to-point correspondences along the contour. The cost functional used in the matching may vary and is determined by the adopted self-similarity criteria, e.g., cocircularity, distance variation, parallelism, and region homogeneity. The loci of middle points of the pairing contour points yield the shape axis and they can be grouped into a unique free tree structure, the SA-tree. By implicitly encoding the (local and global) shape information into an SA-tree, a variety of vision tasks, e.g., shape recognition, comparison, and retrieval, can be performed in a more robust and efficient way via various tree-based algorithms. A dynamic programming algorithm gives the optimal solution in O(N/sup 1/), where N is the size of the contour.
Davi Geiger, Tyng-Luh Liu, Robert Kohn
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
1998 Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes
abstract
Representing shapes is a significant problem for vision systems that must recognize or classify objects. We derive a representation for a given shape by investigating its self-similarities, and constructing its shape axis (SA) and shape axis tree (SA-tree). We start with a shape, its boundary contour, and two different parameterizations for the contour. To measure its self-similarity we consider matching pairs of points (and their tangents) along the boundary contour, i.e., matching the two parameterizations. The matching, of self-similarity criteria may vary, e.g., co-circularity, parallelism, distance, region homogeneity. The loci of middle points of the pairing contour points are the shape axis and they can be grouped into a unique tree graph, the SA-tree. The shape axis for the co-circularity criteria is compared to the symmetry axis. An interpretation in terms of object parts is also presented.
Tyng-Luh Liu, Davi Geiger, Robert Kohn
ICCV3