Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard A. Vaughan

dblp:46/4438 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 50% Memory systems · 25% Performance modeling and evaluation · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems › cache
cache performance
0.011987
The Effect of Instruction Set Complexity on Program Size and Memory Performance · ASPLOS 1987
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture
0.011987
The Effect of Instruction Set Complexity on Program Size and Memory Performance · ASPLOS 1987
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction set architecture › instruction set style
RISC vs CISC
0.011987
The Effect of Instruction Set Complexity on Program Size and Memory Performance · ASPLOS 1987
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
trace-driven simulation
0.011987
The Effect of Instruction Set Complexity on Program Size and Memory Performance · ASPLOS 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace-driven simulation · 0.0compiler construction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 The Effect of Instruction Set Complexity on Program Size and Memory Performance
abstract
One potential disadvantage of a machine with a reduced instruction set is that object programs may be substantially larger than those for a machine with a richer, more complex instruction set. The main reason is that a small instruction set will require more instructions to implement the same function. In addition, the tendency of RISC machines to use fixed length instructions with a few instruction formats also increases object program size. It has been conjectured that the resulting larger programs could adversely affect memory performance and bus traffic. In this paper we report the results of a set of experiments to isolate and determine the effect of instruction set complexity on cache memory performance and bus traffic. Three high-level language compilers were constructed for machines with instruction sets of varying degrees of complexity. Using a set of benchmark programs, we evaluated the effect of instruction set complexity had on program size. Five of the programs were used to perform a set of trace-driven simulations to study each machine's cache and bus performance. While we found that the miss ratio is affected by object program size, it appears that this can be corrected by simplying increasing the size of the cache. Our measurements of bus traffic, however, show that even with large caches, machines with simple instruction sets can expect substantially more main memory reads than machines with dense object programs.
Jack W. Davidson, Richard A. Vaughan
ASPLOS2