Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pavan Kumar Mallapragada
dblp:46/6414
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning paradigms · 39% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% Learning theory · 16% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
least squares regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | GURLS: a least squares library for supervised learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | GURLS: a least squares library for supervised learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation
bag of visual words |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Online visual vocabulary pruning using pairwise constraints · CVPR 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Online visual vocabulary pruning using pairwise constraints · CVPR 2010 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | SemiBoost: Boosting for Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient multi-label ranking for multi-class learning: Application to object recognition · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › ranking
multilabel ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient multi-label ranking for multi-class learning: Application to object recognition · ICCV 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient multi-label ranking for multi-class learning: Application to object recognition · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
semi-supervised boosting |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | SemiBoost: Boosting for Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | SemiBoost: Boosting for Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Online visual vocabulary pruning using pairwise constraints · CVPR 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pairwise constraints · 0.1group lasso · 0.1dual gradient descent · 0.1manifold assumption · 0.1cluster assumption · 0.1boosting · 0.1block coordinate descent · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | GURLS: a least squares library for supervised learning
Andrea Tacchetti, Pavan Kumar Mallapragada, Matteo Santoro, Lorenzo Rosasco |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2010 | Online visual vocabulary pruning using pairwise constraintsabstractGiven a pair of images represented using bag-of-visual-words and a label corresponding to whether the images are “related”(must-link constraint) or “unrelated” (cannot-link constraint), we address the problem of selecting a subset of visual words that are salient in explaining the relation between the image pair. In particular, a subset of features is selected such that the distance computed using these features satisfies the given pairwise constraints. An efficient online feature selection algorithm is presented based on the dual-gradient descent approach. Side information in the form of pair-wise constraints is incorporated into the feature selection stage, providing the user with flexibility to use an unsupervised or semi-supervised algorithm at a later stage. Correlated subsets of visual words, usually resulting from hierarchical quantization process (called groups), are exploited to select a significantly smaller vocabulary. A group-LASSO regularizer is used to drive as many feature weights to zero as possible. We evaluate the quality of the pruned vocabulary by clustering the data using the resulting feature subset. Experiments on PASCAL VOC 2007 dataset using 5000 visual keywords, resulted in around 80% reduction in the number of keywords, with little or no loss in performance. Pavan Kumar Mallapragada, Rong Jin 0001, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2010 | Clustering Face Carvings: Exploring the Devatas of Angkor WatabstractWe propose a framework for clustering and visualization of images of face carvings at archaeological sites. The pairwise similarities among face carvings are computed by performing Procrustes analysis on local facial features (eyes, nose, mouth, etc.). The distance between corresponding face features is computed using point distribution models; the final pairwise similarity is the weighted sum of feature similarities. A web-based interface is provided to allow domain experts to interactively assign different weights to each face feature, and display hierarchical clustering results in 2D or 3D projections obtained by multidimensional scaling. The proposed framework has been successfully applied to the devata goddesses depicted in the ancient Angkor Wat temple. The resulting clusterings and visualization will enable a systematic anthropological, ethnological and artistic analysis of nearly 1,800 stone portraits of devatas of Angkor Wat. Brendan Klare, Pavan Kumar Mallapragada, Anil K. Jain 0001, Kent Davis |
ICPR | 2 |
| 2009 | Efficient multi-label ranking for multi-class learning: Application to object recognitionabstractMulti-label learning is useful in visual object recognition when several objects are present in an image. Conventional approaches implement multi-label learning as a set of binary classification problems, but they suffer from imbalanced data distributions when the number of classes is large. In this paper, we address multi-label learning with many classes via a ranking approach, termed multi-label ranking. Given a test image, the proposed scheme aims to order all the object classes such that the relevant classes are ranked higher than the irrelevant ones. We present an efficient algorithm for multi-label ranking based on the idea of block coordinate descent. The proposed algorithm is applied to visual object recognition. Empirical results on the PASCAL VOC 2006 and 2007 data sets show promising results in comparison to the state-of-the-art algorithms for multi-label learning. Serhat Selcuk Bucak, Pavan Kumar Mallapragada, Rong Jin 0001, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2009 | SemiBoost: Boosting for Semi-Supervised LearningabstractSemi-supervised learning has attracted a significant amount of attention in pattern recognition and machine learning. Most previous studies have focused on designing special algorithms to effectively exploit the unlabeled data in conjunction with labeled data. Our goal is to improve the classification accuracy of any given supervised learning algorithm by using the available unlabeled examples. We call this as the Semi-supervised improvement problem, to distinguish the proposed approach from the existing approaches. We design a metasemi-supervised learning algorithm that wraps around the underlying supervised algorithm and improves its performance using unlabeled data. This problem is particularly important when we need to train a supervised learning algorithm with a limited number of labeled examples and a multitude of unlabeled examples. We present a boosting framework for semi-supervised learning, termed as SemiBoost. The key advantages of the proposed semi-supervised learning approach are: 1) performance improvement of any supervised learning algorithm with a multitude of unlabeled data, 2) efficient computation by the iterative boosting algorithm, and 3) exploiting both manifold and cluster assumption in training classification models. An empirical study on 16 different data sets and text categorization demonstrates that the proposed framework improves the performance of several commonly used supervised learning algorithms, given a large number of unlabeled examples. We also show that the performance of the proposed algorithm, SemiBoost, is comparable to the state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning algorithms. Pavan Kumar Mallapragada, Rong Jin 0001, Anil K. Jain 0001, Yi Liu 0054 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2008 | Active query selection for semi-supervised clusteringabstractSemi-supervised clustering allows a user to specify available prior knowledge about the data to improve the clustering performance. A common way to express this information is in the form of pair-wise constraints. A number of studies have shown that, in general, these constraints improve the resulting data partition. However, the choice of constraints is critical since improperly chosen constraints might actually degrade the clustering performance. We focus on constraint (also known as query) selection for improving the performance of semi-supervised clustering algorithms. We present an active query selection mechanism, where the queries are selected using a min-max criterion. Experimental results on a variety of datasets, using MPCK-means as the underlying semi-clustering algorithm, demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed query selection procedure. Pavan Kumar Mallapragada, Rong Jin 0001, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
ICPR | 1 |