Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tsvetomir Petrov

dblp:46/6772 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112008
Isolation Techniques for Soft Cores · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
system-on-chip testing
0.112008
Isolation Techniques for Soft Cores · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum boolean satisfiability · 0.1heuristic · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Isolation Techniques for Soft Cores
abstract
A cost effective system-on-a-chip (SOC) test strongly hinges on the parallel independent test of SOC cores, which can only be ensured through proper core isolation techniques. Whereas a core isolation mechanism can provide controllability and observability at the core I/O interface, its implementation may have various implications on area, functional timing, test time and data volume, and at-speed coverage on the core interface. In this paper, we provide an in-depth analysis of the soft core isolation problem by covering a wide spectrum of techniques ranging from the utilization of only functional registers to the utilization of only wrapper cells. We model the generalized problem of finding the minimum number of isolation registers, in the form of a mixture of functional registers and wrapper cells, by mapping the problem onto the maximum Boolean satisfiability problem; by utilizing the key findings in this mapping, we implement a computationally efficient heuristic for selecting a subset of core I/Os, on which wrapper cell insertion minimizes the total number of interface registers. Finally, we demonstrate the application of this heuristic, with area and performance constraints also accounted for, delivering a wide spectrum of tradeoff points for isolating a soft core.
Ozgur Sinanoglu, Tsvetomir Petrov
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
2007 A non-intrusive isolation approach for soft cores
abstract
Cost effective SOC test strongly hinges on parallel, independent test of SOC cores, which can only be ensured through proper core isolation techniques. While a core isolation mechanism can provide controllability and observability at the core I/O interface, its implementation may have various implications on area, functional timing, test time and data volume, and at-speed coverage on the core interface. This paper proposed a non-intrusive core isolation technique that is based on the utilization of existing core registers for isolating the core. The authors provide a core register partitioning algorithm that is capable of identifying the core interface registers, and of robustly isolating a core, resulting in a computationally efficient core isolation implementation that is area and performance efficient at the same time. The proposed isolation technique also ensures minimal test time increase and no at-speed coverage loss on the core interface, offering an elegant solution for soft cores, and thus enabling significant SOC test cost reductions
Ozgur Sinanoglu, Tsvetomir Petrov
DATE2