Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lennard J. Dekker

dblp:46/7517 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › peptide sequencing
de novo peptide sequencing
0.212016
Top-down analysis of protein samples by de novo sequencing techniques · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › post-translational modification
post-translational modification analysis
0.212016
Top-down analysis of protein samples by de novo sequencing techniques · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.212016
Top-down analysis of protein samples by de novo sequencing techniques · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry proteomics
top-down proteomics
0.212016
Top-down analysis of protein samples by de novo sequencing techniques · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

string aggregation · 0.2de novo sequencing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Top-down analysis of protein samples by de novo sequencing techniques
abstract
MOTIVATION: Recent technological advances have made high-resolution mass spectrometers affordable to many laboratories, thus boosting rapid development of top-down mass spectrometry, and implying a need in efficient methods for analyzing this kind of data. RESULTS: We describe a method for analysis of protein samples from top-down tandem mass spectrometry data, which capitalizes on de novo sequencing of fragments of the proteins present in the sample. Our algorithm takes as input a set of de novo amino acid strings derived from the given mass spectra using the recently proposed Twister approach, and combines them into aggregated strings endowed with offsets. The former typically constitute accurate sequence fragments of sufficiently well-represented proteins from the sample being analyzed, while the latter indicate their location in the protein sequence, and also bear information on post-translational modifications and fragmentation patterns. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available on the web at http://bioinf.spbau.ru/en/twister CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Kira Vyatkina, Lennard J. Dekker, Martijn M. VanDuijn, Nikola Tolic, Theo M. Luider, Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic, Pavel A. Pevzner
Bioinform.3
2006 A database application for pre-processing, storage and comparison of mass spectra derived from patients and controls
abstract
BACKGROUND: Statistical comparison of peptide profiles in biomarker discovery requires fast, user-friendly software for high throughput data analysis. Important features are flexibility in changing input variables and statistical analysis of peptides that are differentially expressed between patient and control groups. In addition, integration the mass spectrometry data with the results of other experiments, such as microarray analysis, and information from other databases requires a central storage of the profile matrix, where protein id's can be added to peptide masses of interest. RESULTS: A new database application is presented, to detect and identify significantly differentially expressed peptides in peptide profiles obtained from body fluids of patient and control groups. The presented modular software is capable of central storage of mass spectra and results in fast analysis. The software architecture consists of 4 pillars, 1) a Graphical User Interface written in Java, 2) a MySQL database, which contains all metadata, such as experiment numbers and sample codes, 3) a FTP (File Transport Protocol) server to store all raw mass spectrometry files and processed data, and 4) the software package R, which is used for modular statistical calculations, such as the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Statistic analysis by the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in R demonstrates that peptide-profiles of two patient groups 1) breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases and 2) prostate cancer patients in end stage disease can be distinguished from those of control groups. CONCLUSION: The database application is capable to distinguish patient Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI-TOF) peptide profiles from control groups using large size datasets. The modular architecture of the application makes it possible to adapt the application to handle also large sized data from MS/MS- and Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometry experiments. It is expected that the higher resolution and mass accuracy of the FT-ICR mass spectrometry prevents the clustering of peaks of different peptides and allows the identification of differentially expressed proteins from the peptide profiles.
Mark K. Titulaer, Ivar Siccama, Lennard J. Dekker, Angelique L. C. T. van Rijswijk, Ron M. A. Heeren, Peter A. E. Sillevis Smitt, Theo M. Luider
BMC Bioinform.3