Sarah J. Moody

dblp:46/7632 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology
microbiome analysis
0.912025
SPARKI: a tool for the statistical analysis of pathogen identification results · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
pathogen identification
0.912025
SPARKI: a tool for the statistical analysis of pathogen identification results · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.712023
Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
mutational signature analysis
0.712023
Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic modeling · 0.9sparse regression · 0.7non-negative least squares · 0.7forward stagewise algorithm · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SPARKI: a tool for the statistical analysis of pathogen identification results
abstract
MOTIVATION: Many pathogen identification and microbiome analysis tools have been developed in recent years, with Kraken 2 being one of the most popular. While tools downstream of Kraken 2 can assist in the interpretation of its outputs, a statistical framework to assess the likelihood that a taxon/organism is present in a single sample alongside an automated end-to-end analysis pipeline has not yet been fully implemented. RESULTS: Here, we introduce SPARKI, an R package that performs statistical analysis of Kraken 2 outputs and aids in the identification of pathogens present in next-generation sequencing samples. SPARKI adds to the field by bringing a probabilistic view to Kraken 2 data, serving as a discovery tool and complementing other methods such as KrakenTools, Bracken, and Pavian. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SPARKI code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/team113sanger/sparki. SPARKI is also part of an end-to-end pathogen identification pipeline, sparki-nf, which is available at https://github.com/team113sanger/sparki-nf. An additional pipeline for further exploration and validation of SPARKI results is also available at https://github.com/team113sanger/map-to-genome.
Jacqueline M. Boccacino, Martin Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera, Mathew A Beale, Jamie Billington, Ian Vermes, Sofia Obolenski, Kim Wong, Laura Torrens, Sarah J. Moody, Sandra Perdomo, Saamin Cheema, Bailey Francis, Victoria Offord, Adam P. Butler, David J. Adams
Bioinform.9
2023 Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Analysis of mutational signatures is a powerful approach for understanding the mutagenic processes that have shaped the evolution of a cancer genome. To evaluate the mutational signatures operative in a cancer genome, one first needs to quantify their activities by estimating the number of mutations imprinted by each signature. RESULTS: Here we present SigProfilerAssignment, a desktop and an online computational framework for assigning all types of mutational signatures to individual samples. SigProfilerAssignment is the first tool that allows both analysis of copy-number signatures and probabilistic assignment of signatures to individual somatic mutations. As its computational engine, the tool uses a custom implementation of the forward stagewise algorithm for sparse regression and nonnegative least squares for numerical optimization. Analysis of 2700 synthetic cancer genomes with and without noise demonstrates that SigProfilerAssignment outperforms four commonly used approaches for assigning mutational signatures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SigProfilerAssignment is available under the BSD 2-clause license at https://github.com/AlexandrovLab/SigProfilerAssignment with a web implementation at https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/signatures/assignment/.
Marcos Díaz-Gay, Raviteja Vangara, Mark Barnes, Xi Wang 0042, S. M. Ashiqul Islam, Ian Vermes, Stephen Duke, Nithish Bharadhwaj Narasimman, Zichen Jiang, Sarah J. Moody, Sergey Senkin, Paul Brennan, Michael R. Stratton, Ludmil B. Alexandrov
Bioinform.11