Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ganesha Bhaskara
dblp:46/786
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Cellular and mobile networks · 91% Wireless networking · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management
micromobility |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Multicast-based mobility: a novel architecture for efficient micromobility · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2004 |
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management
Mobile IP |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Multicast-based mobility: a novel architecture for efficient micromobility · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2004 |
Cellular and mobile networks
mobility management |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Multicast-based mobility: a novel architecture for efficient micromobility · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2004 |
Wireless networking › WLAN
IEEE 802.11 |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Multicast-based mobility: a novel architecture for efficient micromobility · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ns-2 simulation · 0.0multicast join/prune · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Multicast-based mobility: a novel architecture for efficient micromobilityabstractHandover performance is very important when evaluating IP mobility protocols. If not performed efficiently, handover delays, jitters, and packet loss directly impact application performance. We propose a new architecture for providing efficient handover, while being able to coexist with other protocols. We propose a paradigm for multicast-based micromobility (M&M), where a visiting mobile is assigned a multicast address to use while moving within a domain. The multicast address is obtained using algorithmic mapping, and handover is achieved using multicast join/prune mechanisms. This paper outlines a framework for the design and evaluation of micromobility protocols. We define a suite of protocols (called candidate access router set) to enable multiple-access routers to receive traffic for the mobile node. By changing the number of such routers, timing, and buffering parameters, the protocol may be fine-tuned for specific technologies (e.g., 802.11) and handover scenarios. Extensive NS-2 simulations are used to compare M&M with other micromobility schemes-cellular Internet protocol (CIP) and handoff-aware wireless access Internet infrastructure (HAWAII). For proactive handover scenarios, our results show that M&M and CIP show lower handover delay and packet reordering than HAWAII. M&M, however, handles multiple border routers in a domain, where CIP fails. Also, for scenarios of reactive handover and coverage gaps M&M clearly outperforms CIP and HAWAII. A. A.-G. Helmy, Muhammad Jaseemuddin, Ganesha Bhaskara |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 3 |