Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lin Yong
dblp:46/8587
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 60% Reinforcement learning · 37% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 3% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › out-of-distribution generalization
invariant learning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Continuous Invariance Learning · ICLR 2024 Provably Invariant Learning without Domain Information · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Continuous Invariance Learning · ICLR 2024 Provably Invariant Learning without Domain Information · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
distributional shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Continuous Invariance Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
goal-conditioned reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What is Essential for Unseen Goal Generalization of Offline Goal-conditioned RL? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › goal-conditioned reinforcement learning
offline goal-conditioned reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What is Essential for Unseen Goal Generalization of Offline Goal-conditioned RL? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What is Essential for Unseen Goal Generalization of Offline Goal-conditioned RL? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Provably Invariant Learning without Domain Information · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
weighted imitation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What is Essential for Unseen Goal Generalization of Offline Goal-conditioned RL? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Provably Invariant Learning without Domain Information · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conditional independence · 0.8adversarial procedure · 0.8weighted imitation learning · 0.7variational inference · 0.7pessimism-based offline RL · 0.7invariant risk minimization · 0.7environment partitioning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Continuous Invariance LearningabstractInvariance learning methods aim to learn invariant features in the hope that they generalize under distributional shift. Although many tasks are naturally characterized by continuous domains, current invariance learning techniques generally assume categorically indexed domains. For example, auto-scaling in cloud computing often needs a CPU utilization prediction model that generalizes across different times (e.g., time of a day and date of a year), where `time' is a continuous domain index. In this paper, we start by theoretically showing that existing invariance learning methods can fail for continuous domain problems. Specifically, the naive solution of splitting continuous domains into discrete ones ignores the underlying relationship among domains, and therefore potentially leads to suboptimal performance. To address this challenge, we then propose Continuous Invariance Learning (CIL), which extracts invariant features across continuously indexed domains. CIL is a novel adversarial procedure which measures and controls the conditional independence between the labels and continuous domain indices given the extracted features. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that CIL learns features that satisfy the invariant constraint with infinite samples. Empirical results on both synthetic and real-world datasets (including data collected from production systems) show that CIL consistently outperforms strong baselines among all the tasks. Lin Yong, Fan Zhou 0012, Lintao Ma, Jianmeng Liu, Yansu He, Yu Liu 0071, James Y. Zhang, Yujiu Yang 0001, Hao Wang 0014 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Provably Invariant Learning without Domain InformationabstractTypical machine learning applications always assume the data follows independent and identically distributed (IID) assumptions. In contrast, this assumption is frequently violated in real-world circumstances, leading to the Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization problem and a major drop in model robustness. To mitigate this issue, the invariant learning technique is leveraged to distinguish between spurious features and invariant features among all input features and to train the model purely on the basis of the invariant features. Numerous invariant learning strategies imply that the training data should contain domain information. Such information includes the environment index or auxiliary information acquired from prior knowledge. However, acquiring these information is typically impossible in practice. In this study, we present TIVA for environment-independent invariance learning, which requires no environment-specific information in training data. We discover and prove that, given certain mild data conditions, it is possible to train an environment partitioning policy based on attributes that are independent of the targets and then conduct invariant risk minimization. We examine our method in comparison to other baseline methods, which demonstrate superior performance and excellent robustness under OOD, using multiple benchmarks. Xiaoyu Tan, Lin Yong, Shengyu Zhu 0001, Chao Qu, Xihe Qiu, Yinghui Xu 0001, Peng Cui 0001, Yuan Qi 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | What is Essential for Unseen Goal Generalization of Offline Goal-conditioned RL?abstractOffline goal-conditioned RL (GCRL) offers a way to train general-purpose agents from fully offline datasets. In addition to being conservative within the dataset, the generalization ability to achieve unseen goals is another fundamental challenge for offline GCRL. However, to the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been well studied yet. In this paper, we study out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization of offline GCRL both theoretically and empirically to identify factors that are important. In a number of experiments, we observe that weighted imitation learning enjoys better generalization than pessimism-based offline RL method. Based on this insight, we derive a theory for OOD generalization, which characterizes several important design choices. We then propose a new offline GCRL method, Generalizable Offline goAl-condiTioned RL (GOAT), by combining the findings from our theoretical and empirical studies. On a new benchmark containing 9 independent identically distributed (IID) tasks and 17 OOD tasks, GOAT outperforms current state-of-the-art methods by a large margin. Rui Yang 0010, Lin Yong, Xiaoteng Ma, Hao Hu 0006, Chongjie Zhang, Tong Zhang 0001 |
ICML | 2 |