Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abram L. Friesen
dblp:47/11107
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
11 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 47% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 17% Segmentation and scene understanding · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 72% Algorithms and data structures · 28% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 36, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022 On the role of planning in model-based deep reinforcement learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › learning from human feedback
RLHF |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BOND: Aligning LLMs with Best-of-N Distillation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Introducing Symmetries to Black Box Meta Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › partially observable reinforcement learning › memory-based reinforcement learning
retrieval-augmented reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the role of planning in model-based deep reinforcement learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modular Meta-Learning with Shrinkage · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Submodular Field Grammars: Representation, Inference, and Application to Image Parsing · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
image grammars |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Submodular Field Grammars: Representation, Inference, and Application to Image Parsing · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Learning as a Mixed Convex-Combinatorial Optimization Problem · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Submodular Field Grammars: Representation, Inference, and Application to Image Parsing · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Submodular Field Grammars: Representation, Inference, and Application to Image Parsing · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Learning as a Mixed Convex-Combinatorial Optimization Problem · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Submodular Field Grammars: Representation, Inference, and Application to Image Parsing · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › tractable probabilistic model
sum-product networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Sum-Product Theorem: A Foundation for Learning Tractable Models · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
tractable inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Sum-Product Theorem: A Foundation for Learning Tractable Models · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
tractable probabilistic model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Sum-Product Theorem: A Foundation for Learning Tractable Models · ICML 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Recursive Decomposition for Nonconvex Optimization - IJCAI-15 Distinguished Paper · IJCAI 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures
recursive decomposition |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Recursive Decomposition for Nonconvex Optimization - IJCAI-15 Distinguished Paper · IJCAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | How Prior Probability Influences Decision Making: A Unifying Probabilistic Model · NIPS 2012 An ideal observer model for identifying the reference frame of objects · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network symmetries |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Introducing Symmetries to Black Box Meta Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | How Prior Probability Influences Decision Making: A Unifying Probabilistic Model · NIPS 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | How Prior Probability Influences Decision Making: A Unifying Probabilistic Model · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | An ideal observer model for identifying the reference frame of objects · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › bayesian decision theory
ideal observer model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | An ideal observer model for identifying the reference frame of objects · NIPS 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | An ideal observer model for identifying the reference frame of objects · NIPS 2011 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Estimating the progress of MapReduce pipelines · ICDE 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.9jeffreys divergence · 0.9distribution matching · 0.9value-based planning · 0.6symmetry · 0.6neural network · 0.6implicit value ensemble · 0.6bootstrapping · 0.6black-box meta RL · 0.6DQN · 0.6submodular field grammar · 0.3MAP parsing · 0.3recursive decomposition · 0.2reward maximization · 0.1bayesian belief updating · 0.1POMDP · 0.1progress estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BOND: Aligning LLMs with Best-of-N DistillationabstractReinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a key driver of quality and safety in state-of-the-art large language models.
Yet, a surprisingly simple and strong inference-time strategy is Best-of-N sampling that selects the best generation among N candidates.
In this paper, we propose Best-of-N Distillation (BOND), a novel RLHF algorithm that seeks to emulate Best-of-N but without its significant computational overhead at inference time. Specifically, BOND is a distribution matching algorithm that forces the distribution of generations from the policy to get closer to the Best-of-N distribution. We use the Jeffreys divergence (a linear combination of forward and backward KL) to balance between mode-covering and mode-seeking behavior, and derive an iterative formulation that utilizes a moving anchor for efficiency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and several design choices through experiments on abstractive summarization and Gemma models. Pier Giuseppe Sessa, Robert Dadashi, Léonard Hussenot, Johan Ferret, Nino Vieillard, Alexandre Ramé, Bobak Shahriari, Sarah Perrin, Abram L. Friesen, Geoffrey Cideron, Sertan Girgin, Piotr Stanczyk, Andrea Michi, Danila Sinopalnikov, Sabela Ramos, Amélie Héliou, Aliaksei Severyn, Matt Hoffman 0001, Nikola Momchev, Olivier Bachem |
ICLR | 9 |
| 2022 | Introducing Symmetries to Black Box Meta Reinforcement LearningabstractMeta reinforcement learning (RL) attempts to discover new RL algorithms automatically from environment interaction. In so-called black-box approaches, the policy and the learning algorithm are jointly represented by a single neural network. These methods are very flexible, but they tend to underperform compared to human-engineered RL algorithms in terms of generalisation to new, unseen environments. In this paper, we explore the role of symmetries in meta-generalisation. We show that a recent successful meta RL approach that meta-learns an objective for backpropagation-based learning exhibits certain symmetries (specifically the reuse of the learning rule, and invariance to input and output permutations) that are not present in typical black-box meta RL systems. We hypothesise that these symmetries can play an important role in meta-generalisation. Building off recent work in black-box supervised meta learning, we develop a black-box meta RL system that exhibits these same symmetries. We show through careful experimentation that incorporating these symmetries can lead to algorithms with a greater ability to generalise to unseen action & observation spaces, tasks, and environments. Louis Kirsch, Sebastian Flennerhag, Hado van Hasselt, Abram L. Friesen, Junhyuk Oh, Yutian Chen 0001 |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2022 | Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic UncertaintyabstractUsing a model of the environment and a value function, an agent can construct many estimates of a state’s value, by unrolling the model for different lengths and bootstrapping with its value function. Our key insight is that one can treat this set of value estimates as a type of ensemble, which we call an implicit value ensemble (IVE). Consequently, the discrepancy between these estimates can be used as a proxy for the agent’s epistemic uncertainty; we term this signal model-value inconsistency or self-inconsistency for short. Unlike prior work which estimates uncertainty by training an ensemble of many models and/or value functions, this approach requires only the single model and value function which are already being learned in most model-based reinforcement learning algorithms. We provide empirical evidence in both tabular and function approximation settings from pixels that self-inconsistency is useful (i) as a signal for exploration, (ii) for acting safely under distribution shifts, and (iii) for robustifying value-based planning with a learned model. Angelos Filos, Eszter Vértes, Zita Marinho, Gregory Farquhar, Diana Borsa, Abram L. Friesen, Feryal M. P. Behbahani, Tom Schaul, André Barreto 0001, Simon Osindero |
ICML | 6 |
| 2022 | Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement LearningabstractMost deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms distill experience into parametric behavior policies or value functions via gradient updates. While effective, this approach has several disadvantages: (1) it is computationally expensive, (2) it can take many updates to integrate experiences into the parametric model, (3) experiences that are not fully integrated do not appropriately influence the agent’s behavior, and (4) behavior is limited by the capacity of the model. In this paper we explore an alternative paradigm in which we train a network to map a dataset of past experiences to optimal behavior. Specifically, we augment an RL agent with a retrieval process (parameterized as a neural network) that has direct access to a dataset of experiences. This dataset can come from the agent’s past experiences, expert demonstrations, or any other relevant source. The retrieval process is trained to retrieve information from the dataset that may be useful in the current context, to help the agent achieve its goal faster and more efficiently. The proposed method facilitates learning agents that at test time can condition their behavior on the entire dataset and not only the current state, or current trajectory. We integrate our method into two different RL agents: an offline DQN agent and an online R2D2 agent. In offline multi-task problems, we show that the retrieval-augmented DQN agent avoids task interference and learns faster than the baseline DQN agent. On Atari, we show that retrieval-augmented R2D2 learns significantly faster than the baseline R2D2 agent and achieves higher scores. We run extensive ablations to measure the contributions of the components of our proposed method. Anirudh Goyal, Abram L. Friesen, Andrea Banino, Theophane Weber, Nan Rosemary Ke, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Arthur Guez, Mehdi Mirza, Peter Conway Humphreys, Ksenia Konyushkova, Michal Valko, Simon Osindero, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Nicolas Heess, Charles Blundell |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | On the role of planning in model-based deep reinforcement learning
Jessica B. Hamrick, Abram L. Friesen, Feryal M. P. Behbahani, Arthur Guez, Fabio Viola, Sims Witherspoon, Thomas W. Anthony 0001, Lars Buesing, Petar Velickovic, Theophane Weber |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | Modular Meta-Learning with ShrinkageabstractMany real-world problems, including multi-speaker text-to-speech synthesis, can greatly benefit from the ability to meta-learn large models with only a few task- specific components. Updating only these task-specific modules then allows the model to be adapted to low-data tasks for as many steps as necessary without risking overfitting. Unfortunately, existing meta-learning methods either do not scale to long adaptation or else rely on handcrafted task-specific architectures. Here, we propose a meta-learning approach that obviates the need for this often sub-optimal hand-selection. In particular, we develop general techniques based on Bayesian shrinkage to automatically discover and learn both task-specific and general reusable modules. Empirically, we demonstrate that our method discovers a small set of meaningful task-specific modules and outperforms existing meta- learning approaches in domains like few-shot text-to-speech that have little task data and long adaptation horizons. We also show that existing meta-learning methods including MAML, iMAML, and Reptile emerge as special cases of our method. Yutian Chen 0001, Abram L. Friesen, Feryal M. P. Behbahani, Arnaud Doucet, David Budden, Matt Hoffman 0001, Nando de Freitas |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Deep Learning as a Mixed Convex-Combinatorial Optimization Problem
Abram L. Friesen, Pedro M. Domingos |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Submodular Field Grammars: Representation, Inference, and Application to Image ParsingabstractNatural scenes contain many layers of part-subpart structure, and distributions over them are thus naturally represented by stochastic image grammars, with one production per decomposition of a part. Unfortunately, in contrast to language grammars, where the number of possible split points for a production $A \rightarrow BC$ is linear in the length of $A$, in an image there are an exponential number of ways to split a region into subregions. This makes parsing intractable and requires image grammars to be severely restricted in practice, for example by allowing only rectangular regions. In this paper, we address this problem by associating with each production a submodular Markov random field whose labels are the subparts and whose labeling segments the current object into these subparts. We call the result a submodular field grammar (SFG). Finding the MAP split of a region into subregions is now tractable, and by exploiting this we develop an efficient approximate algorithm for MAP parsing of images with SFGs. Empirically, we present promising improvements in accuracy when using SFGs for scene understanding, and show exponential improvements in inference time compared to traditional methods, while returning comparable minima. Abram L. Friesen, Pedro M. Domingos |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | The Sum-Product Theorem: A Foundation for Learning Tractable ModelsabstractInference in expressive probabilistic models is generally intractable, which makes them difficult to learn and limits their applicability. Sum-product networks are a class of deep models where, surprisingly, inference remains tractable even when an arbitrary number of hidden layers are present. In this paper, we generalize this result to a much broader set of learning problems: all those where inference consists of summing a function over a semiring. This includes satisfiability, constraint satisfaction, optimization, integration, and others. In any semiring, for summation to be tractable it suffices that the factors of every product have disjoint scopes. This unifies and extends many previous results in the literature. Enforcing this condition at learning time thus ensures that the learned models are tractable. We illustrate the power and generality of this approach by applying it to a new type of structured prediction problem: learning a nonconvex function that can be globally optimized in polynomial time. We show empirically that this greatly outperforms the standard approach of learning without regard to the cost of optimization. Abram L. Friesen, Pedro M. Domingos |
ICML | 1 |
| 2015 | Recursive Decomposition for Nonconvex Optimization - IJCAI-15 Distinguished Paper
Abram L. Friesen, Pedro M. Domingos |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2012 | How Prior Probability Influences Decision Making: A Unifying Probabilistic ModelabstractHow does the brain combine prior knowledge with sensory evidence when making decisions under uncertainty? Two competing descriptive models have been proposed based on experimental data. The first posits an additive offset to a decision variable, implying a static effect of the prior. However, this model is inconsistent with recent data from a motion discrimination task involving temporal integration of uncertain sensory evidence. To explain this data, a second model has been proposed which assumes a time-varying influence of the prior. Here we present a normative model of decision making that incorporates prior knowledge in a principled way. We show that the additive offset model and the time-varying prior model emerge naturally when decision making is viewed within the framework of partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs). Decision making in the model reduces to (1) computing beliefs given observations and prior information in a Bayesian manner, and (2) selecting actions based on these beliefs to maximize the expected sum of future rewards. We show that the model can explain both data previously explained using the additive offset model as well as more recent data on the time-varying influence of prior knowledge on decision making. Yanping Huang, Abram L. Friesen, Timothy D. Hanks, Michael N. Shadlen, Rajesh P. N. Rao |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2011 | Gaze Following as Goal Inference: A Bayesian Model
Abram L. Friesen, Rajesh P. N. Rao |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2011 | An ideal observer model for identifying the reference frame of objectsabstractThe object people perceive in an image can depend on its orientation relative to the scene it is in (its reference frame). For example, the images of the symbols $\times$ and $+$ differ by a 45 degree rotation. Although real scenes have multiple images and reference frames, psychologists have focused on scenes with only one reference frame. We propose an ideal observer model based on nonparametric Bayesian statistics for inferring the number of reference frames in a scene and their parameters. When an ambiguous image could be assigned to two conflicting reference frames, the model predicts two factors should influence the reference frame inferred for the image: The image should be more likely to share the reference frame of the closer object ({\em proximity}) and it should be more likely to share the reference frame containing the most objects ({\em alignment}). We confirm people use both cues using a novel methodology that allows for easy testing of human reference frame inference. Joseph L. Austerweil, Abram L. Friesen, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2010 | Estimating the progress of MapReduce pipelinesabstractIn parallel query-processing environments, accurate, time-oriented progress indicators could provide much utility given that inter- and intra-query execution times can have high variance. However, none of the techniques used by existing tools or available in the literature provide non-trivial progress estimation for parallel queries. In this paper, we introduce Parallax, the first such indicator. While several parallel data processing systems exist, the work in this paper targets environments where queries consist of a series of MapReduce jobs. Parallax builds on recently-developed techniques for estimating the progress of single-site SQL queries, but focuses on the challenges related to parallelism and variable execution speeds. We have implemented our estimator in the Pig system and demonstrate its performance through experiments with the PigMix benchmark and other queries running in a real, small-scale cluster. Kristi Morton, Abram L. Friesen, Magdalena Balazinska, Dan Grossman |
ICDE | 2 |