Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Arnaud Lanoix

dblp:47/1163 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 61% Software maintenance and evolution · 30% Program verification · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › component-based software engineering
component-based systems		 0.112012
When Structural Refinement of Components Keeps Temporal Properties over Reconfigurations · FM 2012
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture		 0.112012
When Structural Refinement of Components Keeps Temporal Properties over Reconfigurations · FM 2012
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution › software adaptation
software reconfiguration		 0.112012
When Structural Refinement of Components Keeps Temporal Properties over Reconfigurations · FM 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural refinement · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Introducing probabilistic reasoning within Event-B
Mohamed Amine Aouadhi, Benoît Delahaye, Arnaud Lanoix
 Softw. Syst. Model.3
2018 A Model-Driven Method for Fast Building Consistent Web Services in Practice
abstract
International audience
David Sferruzza, Jérôme Rocheteau, J. Christian Attiogbé, Arnaud Lanoix
 MODELSWARD4
2018 Extending OpenAPI 3.0 to Build Web Services from their Specification
abstract
International audience
David Sferruzza, Jérôme Rocheteau, J. Christian Attiogbé, Arnaud Lanoix
 WEBIST4
2012 When Structural Refinement of Components Keeps Temporal Properties over Reconfigurations
Julien Dormoy, Olga Kouchnarenko, Arnaud Lanoix
 FM3
2008 Using CSP||B Components: Application to a Platoon of Vehicles
Samuel Colin, Arnaud Lanoix, Olga Kouchnarenko, Jeanine Souquières
 FMICS2
2008 Event-B Specification of a Situated Multi-Agent System: Study of a Platoon of Vehicles
abstract
Situated multi-agents systems (MAS), and other agent- based systems, are often complex. Formal reasoning is needed to ensure their correctness and structure their development. Event-B is a formal method with tool support allowing a stepwise development of reactive distributed systems. We propose using Event-B to helpful the specification and the safe development of situated MAS. In this article, we mainly report our experience with the Event-B stepwise development of a situated MAS which study the movement of vehicles in a convoy. This article also aims at serving as a guide for the development of other MAS, taking agents- specific features into account.
Arnaud Lanoix
 TASE1