Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

A. Tsantilas

dblp:47/169 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 44% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 44% Parallel and multicore computing · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › fault-tolerant architecture
fault-tolerant processor arrays
0.011990
Asymptotically Tight Bounds for Computing with Faulty Arrays of Processors (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › parallel algorithm design
systolic algorithms
0.011990
Asymptotically Tight Bounds for Computing with Faulty Arrays of Processors (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knot theory · 0.0fault model analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Asymptotically Tight Bounds for Computing with Faulty Arrays of Processors (Extended Abstract)
abstract
The computational power of 2-D and 3-D processor arrays that contain a potentially large number of faults is analyzed. Both a random and a worst-case fault model are considered, and it is proved that in either scenario low-dimensional arrays are surprisingly fault tolerant. It is also shown how to route, sort, and perform systolic algorithms for problems such as matrix multiplication in optimal time on faulty arrays. In many cases, the running time is the same as if there were no faults in the array (up to constant factors). On the negative side, it is shown that any constant congestion embedding of an n*n fault-free array on an n*n array with Theta (n/sup 2/) random faults (or Theta (log n) worst-case faults) requires dilation Theta (log n). For 3-D arrays, knot theory is used to prove that the required dilation is Omega ( square root log n).>
Christos Kaklamanis, Anna R. Karlin, Frank Thomson Leighton, Victor J. Milenkovic, Prabhakar Raghavan, Satish Rao, Clark D. Thomborson, A. Tsantilas
FOCS8