Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. Tsantilas
dblp:47/169
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 44% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 44% Parallel and multicore computing · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › fault-tolerant architecture
fault-tolerant processor arrays |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Asymptotically Tight Bounds for Computing with Faulty Arrays of Processors (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › parallel algorithm design
systolic algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Asymptotically Tight Bounds for Computing with Faulty Arrays of Processors (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knot theory · 0.0fault model analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Asymptotically Tight Bounds for Computing with Faulty Arrays of Processors (Extended Abstract)abstractThe computational power of 2-D and 3-D processor arrays that contain a potentially large number of faults is analyzed. Both a random and a worst-case fault model are considered, and it is proved that in either scenario low-dimensional arrays are surprisingly fault tolerant. It is also shown how to route, sort, and perform systolic algorithms for problems such as matrix multiplication in optimal time on faulty arrays. In many cases, the running time is the same as if there were no faults in the array (up to constant factors). On the negative side, it is shown that any constant congestion embedding of an n*n fault-free array on an n*n array with Theta (n/sup 2/) random faults (or Theta (log n) worst-case faults) requires dilation Theta (log n). For 3-D arrays, knot theory is used to prove that the required dilation is Omega ( square root log n).> Christos Kaklamanis, Anna R. Karlin, Frank Thomson Leighton, Victor J. Milenkovic, Prabhakar Raghavan, Satish Rao, Clark D. Thomborson, A. Tsantilas |
FOCS | 8 |