Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arvind Srinivasan 0002

dblp:47/1826-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Question answering and dialogue systems · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning
0.812024
JoLT: Jointly Learned Representations of Language and Time-Series for Clinical Time-Series Interpretation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question answering over structured data
time-series question answering
0.212024
JoLT: Jointly Learned Representations of Language and Time-Series for Clinical Time-Series Interpretation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

querying transformer · 1.5pre-trained time-series model · 1.5pre-trained language model · 1.5design space analysis · 1.3benchmarking · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 JoLT: Jointly Learned Representations of Language and Time-Series for Clinical Time-Series Interpretation (Student Abstract)
abstract
Time-series and text data are prevalent in healthcare and frequently co-exist, yet they are typically modeled in isolation. Even studies that jointly model time-series and text, do so by converting time-series to images or graphs. We hypothesize that explicitly modeling time-series jointly with text can improve tasks such as summarization and question answering for time-series data, which have received little attention so far. To address this gap, we introduce JoLT to jointly learn desired representations from pre-trained time-series and text models. JoLT utilizes a Querying Transformer (Q-Former) to align the time-series and text representations. Our experiments on a large real-world electrocardiography dataset for medical time-series summarization show that JoLT outperforms state-of-the-art image captioning approaches.
Yifu Cai, Arvind Srinivasan 0002, Mononito Goswami, Arjun Choudhry, Artur Dubrawski
AAAI2
2023 AQuA: A Benchmarking Tool for Label Quality Assessment
abstract
Machine learning (ML) models are only as good as the data they are trained on. But recent studies have found datasets widely used to train and evaluate ML models, e.g. ImageNet, to have pervasive labeling errors. Erroneous labels on the train set hurt ML models' ability to generalize, and they impact evaluation and model selection using the test set. Consequently, learning in the presence of labeling errors is an active area of research, yet this field lacks a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate these methods. Most of these methods are evaluated on a few computer vision datasets with significant variance in the experimental protocols. With such a large pool of methods and inconsistent evaluation, it is also unclear how ML practitioners can choose the right models to assess label quality in their data. To this end, we propose a benchmarking environment AQuA to rigorously evaluate methods that enable machine learning in the presence of label noise. We also introduce a design space to delineate concrete design choices of label error detection models. We hope that our proposed design space and benchmark enable practitioners to choose the right tools to improve their label quality and that our benchmark enables objective and rigorous evaluation of machine learning tools facing mislabeled data.
Mononito Goswami, Vedant Sanil, Arjun Choudhry, Arvind Srinivasan 0002, Chalisa Udompanyawit, Artur Dubrawski
NeurIPS4
2021 Optimization of Image Embeddings for Few Shot Learning
abstract
In this paper we improve the image embeddings generated in the graph neural network solution for few shot learning. We propose alternate architectures for existing networks such as Inception-Net, U-Net, Attention U-Net, and Squeeze-Net to generate embeddings and increase the accuracy of the models. We improve the quality of embeddings created at the cost of the time taken to generate them. The proposed implementations outperform the existing state of the art methods for 1-shot and 5-shot learning on the Omniglot dataset. The experiments involved a testing set and training set which had no common classes between them. The results for 5-way and 10-way/20-way tests have been tabulated.
Arvind Srinivasan 0002, Aprameya Bharadwaj, Manasa Sathyan, S. Natarajan 0001
ICPRAM1