Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Regula Rupp
dblp:47/3305
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic network
phylogenetic network inference |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Phylogenetic networks do not need to be complex: using fewer reticulations to represent conflicting clusters · Bioinform. 2010 Computing galled networks from real data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Computing galled networks from real data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
reticulate evolution |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Phylogenetic networks do not need to be complex: using fewer reticulations to represent conflicting clusters · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parsimony · 0.1cass algorithm · 0.1cluster representation · 0.1NP-complete problem solving · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Phylogenetic networks do not need to be complex: using fewer reticulations to represent conflicting clustersabstractUNLABELLED: Phylogenetic trees are widely used to display estimates of how groups of species are evolved. Each phylogenetic tree can be seen as a collection of clusters, subgroups of the species that evolved from a common ancestor. When phylogenetic trees are obtained for several datasets (e.g. for different genes), then their clusters are often contradicting. Consequently, the set of all clusters of such a dataset cannot be combined into a single phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that can be used to display more complex evolutionary histories, including reticulate events, such as hybridizations, recombinations and horizontal gene transfers. Here, we present the new Cass algorithm that can combine any set of clusters into a phylogenetic network. We show that the networks constructed by Cass are usually simpler than networks constructed by other available methods. Moreover, we show that Cass is guaranteed to produce a network with at most two reticulations per biconnected component, whenever such a network exists. We have implemented Cass and integrated it into the freely available Dendroscope software. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Leo van Iersel, Steven Kelk, Regula Rupp, Daniel H. Huson |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2009 | Computing galled networks from real dataabstractMOTIVATION: Developing methods for computing phylogenetic networks from biological data is an important problem posed by molecular evolution and much work is currently being undertaken in this area. Although promising approaches exist, there are no tools available that biologists could easily and routinely use to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing tens or hundreds of taxa. Biologists are interested in clades, i.e. groups of monophyletic taxa, and these are usually represented by clusters in a rooted phylogenetic tree. The problem of computing an optimal rooted phylogenetic network from a set of clusters, is hard, in general. Indeed, even the problem of just determining whether a given network contains a given cluster is hard. Hence, some researchers have focused on topologically restricted classes of networks, such as galled trees and level-k networks, that are more tractable, but have the practical draw-back that a given set of clusters will usually not possess such a representation. RESULTS: In this article, we argue that galled networks (a generalization of galled trees) provide a good trade-off between level of generality and tractability. Any set of clusters can be represented by some galled network and the question whether a cluster is contained in such a network is easy to solve. Although the computation of an optimal galled network involves successively solving instances of two different NP-complete problems, in practice our algorithm solves this problem exactly on large datasets containing hundreds of taxa and many reticulations in seconds, as illustrated by a dataset containing 279 prokaryotes. AVAILABILITY: We provide a fast, robust and easy-to-use implementation of this work in version 2.0 of our tree-handling software Dendroscope, freely available from http://www.dendroscope.org. Daniel H. Huson, Regula Rupp, Vincent Berry, Philippe Gambette, Christophe Paul |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2008 | Summarizing Multiple Gene Trees Using Cluster Networks
Daniel H. Huson, Regula Rupp |
WABI | 2 |
| 2007 | Dendroscope: An interactive viewer for large phylogenetic treesabstractBACKGROUND: Research in evolution requires software for visualizing and editing phylogenetic trees, for increasingly very large datasets, such as arise in expression analysis or metagenomics, for example. It would be desirable to have a program that provides these services in an efficient and user-friendly way, and that can be easily installed and run on all major operating systems. Although a large number of tree visualization tools are freely available, some as a part of more comprehensive analysis packages, all have drawbacks in one or more domains. They either lack some of the standard tree visualization techniques or basic graphics and editing features, or they are restricted to small trees containing only tens of thousands of taxa. Moreover, many programs are difficult to install or are not available for all common operating systems. RESULTS: We have developed a new program, Dendroscope, for the interactive visualization and navigation of phylogenetic trees. The program provides all standard tree visualizations and is optimized to run interactively on trees containing hundreds of thousands of taxa. The program provides tree editing and graphics export capabilities. To support the inspection of large trees, Dendroscope offers a magnification tool. The software is written in Java 1.4 and installers are provided for Linux/Unix, MacOS X and Windows XP. CONCLUSION: Dendroscope is a user-friendly program for visualizing and navigating phylogenetic trees, for both small and large datasets. Daniel H. Huson, Daniel C. Richter, Christian Rausch, Tobias Dezulian, Markus Franz, Regula Rupp |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |