Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

E. John Sebes

dblp:47/4853 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Authentication and access control · 85% Hardware security and side channels · 15%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed system security
distributed application security
0.012000
Secure Virtual Enclaves: Supporting Coalition Use of Distributed Application Technologies · NDSS 2000
Authentication and access control
access control
0.011999
Scalable Access Control for Distributed Object Systems · USENIX Security Symposium 1999
Authentication and access control › access control
distributed access control
0.011999
Scalable Access Control for Distributed Object Systems · USENIX Security Symposium 1999
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.012000
Secure Virtual Enclaves: Supporting Coalition Use of Distributed Application Technologies · NDSS 2000
Distributed systems
distributed object systems
0.011999
Scalable Access Control for Distributed Object Systems · USENIX Security Symposium 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

capability-based access control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Solvable problems in enterprise digital rights management
abstract
Purpose Digital rights management (DRM) is often promoted as the technical basis for solutions to enterprise security problems requiring persistent protection. Yet to date, DRM has failed to take hold within the enterprise sphere. This paper aims to examine some possible reasons for the slow adoption of enterprise DRM. Design/methodology/approach It is argued that contrary to the common perception current DRM technology is sufficiently robust for use in enterprise applications. Then three problems that may serve as barriers to enterprise DRM adoption, namely, trustworthy authentication, access policy management and the lack of compelling enterprise applications that require DRM are discussed. Finally, brief examples are presented drawn from the real world that illustrate that the first two barriers can be overcome, and it is argued that regulatory compliance is the “killer app” that will drive enterprise DRM adoption. Findings Finds, amongst other things, that technical weakness in enterprise DRM systems, especially regarding authentication and authorization, can be addressed with relatively simple mechanisms. Originality/value This paper points up the need for more sophisticated enterprise DRM solutions.
E. John Sebes, Mark Stamp 0001
Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur.1
2001 Secure virtual enclaves: Supporting coalition use of distributed application technologies
abstract
The Secure Virtual Enclaves (SVE) collaboration infrastructure allows multiple organizations to share their distributed application objects, while respecting organizational autonomy over local resources. The infrastructure is transparent to applications, which may be accessed via a web server, or may be based on Java or Microsoft's DCOM. The SVE infrastructure is implemented in middleware, with no modifications to COTS operating systems or network protocols. The system enables dynamic updates to security policies to support changes in both coalition membership and participants' perception of risks. While the prototype demonstrates fine-grained access control for secure collaborative computing, we have identified significant issues that remain to be addressed, particularly in the area of policy development, before such collaboration will be convenient. The SVE infrastructure offers a platform and conceptual basis for further exploration of these issues and experimentation with new solutions.
Deborah Shands, Jay Jacobs, Richard Yee, E. John Sebes
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur.4
2000 Secure Virtual Enclaves: Supporting Coalition Use of Distributed Application Technologies
Deborah Shands, Richard Yee, Jay Jacobs, E. John Sebes
NDSS4
1999 Scalable Access Control for Distributed Object Systems
Daniel F. Sterne, Gregg Tally, C. Durward McDonell, David L. Sherman, David Sames, Pierre X. Pasturel, E. John Sebes
USENIX Security Symposium7
1997 Distributed Object Technologies, Databases and Security
Catherine D. McCollum, Donald B. Faatz, William R. Herndon, E. John Sebes, Roshan K. Thomas
DBSec4
1996 SIGMA: Security For Distributed Object Interoperability Between Trusted And Untrusted Systems
abstract
The SIGMA project is researching the integration and interoperation of security technologies into distributed computing environments based on CORBA, the Common Object Request Broker Architecture. The architectural results described in the paper are focused on security technologies that allow controlled, selective exchange of object oriented services among separate distributed systems that differ in security policy, mechanisms, and assurance. A central goal for our work in this area is to identify and prototype techniques that enable CORBA based application interoperation between trusted and untrusted distributed systems.
E. John Sebes, Terry V. Benzel
ACSAC1
1991 Implicit Discretionary Access Propagation: A new Interpretation of DAC
abstract
In most trusted systems, discretionary access to objects can be obtained in ways not explicitly allowed by the discretionary access control (DAC) policy. This well-understood observation is examined in the context of client-server architectures, and compared both to the traditional understanding of DAC and to existing trusted systems. The results are used as the basis for an argument for a new understanding of DAC and its implications for the design of trusted systems.>
E. John Sebes, Richard J. Feiertag
CSFW1