Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Suzanne M. Mahoney

dblp:47/5497 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.012000
Network Engineering for Agile Belief Network Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2000
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge elicitation
0.012000
Network Engineering for Agile Belief Network Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spiral lifecycle model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Hypothesis Management in Situation-Specific Network Construction
Kathryn B. Laskey, Suzanne M. Mahoney, Edward J. Wright
UAI2
2000 Network Engineering for Agile Belief Network Models
abstract
The construction of a large, complex belief network model, like any major system development effort, requires a structured process to manage system design and development. This paper describes a belief network engineering process based on the spiral system lifecycle model. The problem of specifying numerical probability distributions for random variables in a belief network is best treated not in isolation, but within the broader context of the system development effort as a whole. Because structural assumptions determine which numerical probabilities or parameter values need to be specified, there is an interaction between specification of structure and parameters. Evaluation of successive prototypes serves to refine system requirements, ensure that modeling and elicitation effort are focused productively, and prioritize directions of enhancement and improvement for future prototypes. Explicit representation of semantic information associated with probability assessments facilitates tracing of the rationale for modeling decisions, as well as supporting maintenance and enhancement of the knowledge base.
Kathryn B. Laskey, Suzanne M. Mahoney
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
1999 Representing and Combining Partially Specified CPTs
Suzanne M. Mahoney, Kathryn B. Laskey
UAI1
1998 Constructing Situation Specific Belief Networks
Suzanne M. Mahoney, Kathryn B. Laskey
UAI1
1997 Network Fragments: Representing Knowledge for Constructing Probabilistic Models
Kathryn B. Laskey, Suzanne M. Mahoney
UAI2
1996 Network Engineering for Complex Belief Networks
Suzanne M. Mahoney, Kathryn B. Laskey
UAI1