Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Suzanne M. Mahoney
dblp:47/5497
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Network Engineering for Agile Belief Network Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2000 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge elicitation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Network Engineering for Agile Belief Network Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spiral lifecycle model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Hypothesis Management in Situation-Specific Network Construction
Kathryn B. Laskey, Suzanne M. Mahoney, Edward J. Wright |
UAI | 2 |
| 2000 | Network Engineering for Agile Belief Network ModelsabstractThe construction of a large, complex belief network model, like any major system development effort, requires a structured process to manage system design and development. This paper describes a belief network engineering process based on the spiral system lifecycle model. The problem of specifying numerical probability distributions for random variables in a belief network is best treated not in isolation, but within the broader context of the system development effort as a whole. Because structural assumptions determine which numerical probabilities or parameter values need to be specified, there is an interaction between specification of structure and parameters. Evaluation of successive prototypes serves to refine system requirements, ensure that modeling and elicitation effort are focused productively, and prioritize directions of enhancement and improvement for future prototypes. Explicit representation of semantic information associated with probability assessments facilitates tracing of the rationale for modeling decisions, as well as supporting maintenance and enhancement of the knowledge base. Kathryn B. Laskey, Suzanne M. Mahoney |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 2 |
| 1999 | Representing and Combining Partially Specified CPTs
Suzanne M. Mahoney, Kathryn B. Laskey |
UAI | 1 |
| 1998 | Constructing Situation Specific Belief Networks
Suzanne M. Mahoney, Kathryn B. Laskey |
UAI | 1 |
| 1997 | Network Fragments: Representing Knowledge for Constructing Probabilistic Models
Kathryn B. Laskey, Suzanne M. Mahoney |
UAI | 2 |
| 1996 | Network Engineering for Complex Belief Networks
Suzanne M. Mahoney, Kathryn B. Laskey |
UAI | 1 |