Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huaiqing Wu

dblp:47/7173 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 18%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
coverage guarantee
0.712023
Stability of Random Forests and Coverage of Random-Forest Prediction Intervals · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
prediction intervals
0.712023
Stability of Random Forests and Coverage of Random-Forest Prediction Intervals · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › tree ensembles
random forest
0.712023
Stability of Random Forests and Coverage of Random-Forest Prediction Intervals · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
stability analysis
0.712023
Stability of Random Forests and Coverage of Random-Forest Prediction Intervals · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection › model averaging
bayesian model averaging
0.212016
Structure Learning in Bayesian Networks of a Moderate Size by Efficient Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.212016
Structure Learning in Bayesian Networks of a Moderate Size by Efficient Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning
0.212016
Structure Learning in Bayesian Networks of a Moderate Size by Efficient Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence analysis
non-asymptotic analysis
0.212023
Stability of Random Forests and Coverage of Random-Forest Prediction Intervals · NeurIPS 2023
Program verification
model checking
0.112010
A bounded statistical approach for model checking of unbounded until properties · ASE 2010
Program verification › model checking
statistical model checking
0.112010
A bounded statistical approach for model checking of unbounded until properties · ASE 2010
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
probabilistic model checking
0.112010
A bounded statistical approach for model checking of unbounded until properties · ASE 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

out-of-bag error · 0.7jackknife · 0.7sampling · 0.2markov chain monte carlo · 0.2hypothesis testing · 0.2PCTL · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Stability of Random Forests and Coverage of Random-Forest Prediction Intervals
abstract
We establish stability of random forests under the mild condition that the squared response ($Y^2$) does not have a heavy tail. In particular, our analysis holds for the practical version of random forests that is implemented in popular packages like \texttt{randomForest} in \texttt{R}. Empirical results show that stability may persist even beyond our assumption and hold for heavy-tailed $Y^2$. Using the stability property, we prove a non-asymptotic lower bound for the coverage probability of prediction intervals constructed from the out-of-bag error of random forests. With another mild condition that is typically satisfied when $Y$ is continuous, we also establish a complementary upper bound, which can be similarly established for the jackknife prediction interval constructed from an arbitrary stable algorithm. We also discuss the asymptotic coverage probability under assumptions weaker than those considered in previous literature. Our work implies that random forests, with its stability property, is an effective machine learning method that can provide not only satisfactory point prediction but also justified interval prediction at almost no extra computational cost.
Huaiqing Wu, Dan Nettleton
NeurIPS2
2016 Structure Learning in Bayesian Networks of a Moderate Size by Efficient Sampling
abstract
We study the Bayesian model averaging approach to learning Bayesian network structures (DAGs) from data. We develop new algorithms including the first algorithm that is able to efficiently sample DAGs of a moderate size (with up to about 25 variables) according to the exact structure posterior. The DAG samples can then be used to construct estimators for the posterior of any feature. We theoretically prove good properties of our estimators and empirically show that our estimators considerably outperform the estimators from the previous state- of-the-art methods.
Ru He, Jin Tian 0001, Huaiqing Wu
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2010 A bounded statistical approach for model checking of unbounded until properties
abstract
We study the problem of statistical model checking of probabilistic systems for PCTL unbounded until property PJoinp(Æ1UÆ2) (where Join |X| {<, d, >, e}) using the computation of P d 0(Æ1UÆ2). The approach is first proposed by Sen et al. in CAV'05 but their approach suffers from two drawbacks. Firstly, the computation of Pd0Æ1UÆ2) requires for its validity, a user-specified input parameter ´2 which the user is unlikely to correctly provide. Secondly, the validity of computation of Pd0Æ1UÆ2) is limited only to probabilistic models that do not contain loops. We present a new technique which addresses both problems described above. Essentially our technique transforms the hypothesis test for the unbounded until property in the original model into a new equivalent hypothesis test for bounded until property in our modified model. We empirically show the effectiveness of our technique and compare our results with those using the method proposed by Sen et al.
Ru He, Paul Jennings, Samik Basu 0001, Arka P. Ghosh, Huaiqing Wu
ASE5