In multi-agent systems, when we account for the possibility of delays during execution, online planning becomes more complicated, as both execution and planning should be able to handle delays when agents are moving. Lifelong Multi-Agent Path Finding (LMAPF) is the problem of (re)planning the collision-free moves of agents to their goals in a shared space, while agents continuously receive new goals. PIE (Planning and Improving while Executing) is a recent approach to LMAPF which concurrently replans later parts of agents' trajectories while execution occurs. However, the execution is assumed to be perfect. Existing approaches either use policy-based methods to quickly coordinate agents every timestep with instant delay feedback, or deploy an execution policy to adjust a solution for delays on the fly. These approaches may introduce large amounts of unnecessary delays to agents due to their planner guarantees or simple delay-handling policies. In this paper, we extend PIE to define a framework for solving the lifelong MAPF problem with execution delays. We instantiate our framework with different execution and replanning strategies, and experimentally evaluate them. Overall, we find that this framework can substantially improve the throughput by up to a factor 3 for lifelong MAPF, compared to approaches that handle delays with simple execution policies.

Prioritised Planning (PP) is a popular approach for multi-agent and multi-robot navigation. In PP, collision-free paths are computed for one agent at a time, following a total order over the agents, called a priority ordering. Many MAPF algorithms follow this approach or use it in some way, including several state-of-the-art MAPF algorithms, although it is known that PP is neither complete nor optimal. In this work, we characterise the space of problems a PP algorithm can solve, and define the search problem of identifying whether a given MAPF problem is in that space. We call this search problem Prioritised MAPF (P-MAPF) and investigate its computational complexity, showing that it is generally NP-hard. Then, we develop a novel efficient search algorithm called Path and Priority Search (PaPS), which solves P-MAPF, providing guarantees of completeness and optimality. We next observe that PP algorithms operate with two primary degrees of freedom – the choice of priority ordering, and the choice of individual paths for agents. Accordingly, we further divide P-MAPF into two planning problems corresponding to the two degrees of freedom. We call them Priority-Function Constrained MAPF (PFC-MAPF), where the path choice is fixed while the priority ordering is not, and Priority Constrained MAPF (PC-MAPF), where the priority ordering is fixed while the path choice is not. We analyse these problems as well, and show how PaPS can be easily adapted to create algorithms that solve these problems optimally. We experiment with our algorithms in a range of settings, including comparisons with existing PP baselines. Our results show how the different degrees of freedom of PP-based algorithms affect their behaviour, and provide the first-known results for solution-quality optimality for PP-based algorithms on a popular MAPF benchmark set. The latter can be used as a lower bound for any PP algorithm.

In applications of Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), it is often the sum of planning and execution times that needs to be minimised (i.e., the Goal Achievement Time). Yet current methods seldom optimise for this objective. Optimal algorithms reduce execution time, but may require exponential planning time. Non-optimal algorithms reduce planning time, but at the expense of increased path length. To address these limitations we introduce PIE (Planning and Improving while Executing), a new framework for concurrent planning and execution in MAPF. We show how different instantiations of PIE affect practical performance, including initial planning time, action commitment time and concurrent vs. sequential planning and execution. We then adapt PIE to Lifelong MAPF, a popular application setting where agents are continuously assigned new goals and where additional decisions are required to ensure feasibility. We examine a variety of different approaches to overcome these challenges and we conduct comparative experiments vs. recently proposed alternatives. Results show that PIE substantially outperforms existing methods for One-shot and Lifelong MAPF.

Prioritised Planning (PP) is a family of incomplete and sub-optimal algorithms for multi-agent and multi-robot navigation. In PP, agents compute collision-free paths in a fixed order, one at a time. Although fast and usually effective, PP can still fail, leaving users without explanation or recourse. In this work, we give a theoretical and empirical basis for better understanding the underlying problem solved by PP, which we call Priority Constrained MAPF (PC-MAPF). We first investigate the complexity of PC-MAPF and show that the decision problem is NP-hard. We then develop Priority Constrained Search (PCS), a new algorithm that is both complete and optimal with respect to a fixed priority ordering. We experiment with PCS in a range of settings, including comparisons with existing PP baselines, and we give first-known results for optimal PC-MAPF on a popular benchmark set.

In applications of Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), it is often the sum of planning and execution times that needs to be minimised (i.e., the Goal Achievement Time). Yet current methods seldom optimise for this objective. Optimal algorithms reduce execution time, but may require exponential planning time. Non-optimal algorithms reduce planning time, but at the expense of increased path length. To address these limitations we introduce PIE (Planning and Improving while Executing), a new framework for concurrent planning and execution in MAPF. We first show how PIE for one-shot MAPF improves practical performance compared to sequential planning and execution.We then adapt PIE to Lifelong MAPF, a popular application setting where agents are continuously assigned new goals and where additional decisions are required to ensure feasibility. We examine a variety of different approaches to overcome these challenges and we conduct comparative experiments vs. recently proposed alternatives. Results show that PIE substantially outperforms existing methods for One-shot and Lifelong MAPF.

Current approaches for real-world Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) usually start with a simplified MAPF model and modify the resulting plans so they are kinematically feasible. We investigate one such problem, called MAPF with turn actions MAPF_T, and show that ignoring the kinematic constraints significantly increases solution cost. A first modification of the popular Conflict-Based Search algorithm to MAPF_T yields significantly better plans but comes at the cost of substantial decreases in scalability. We then introduce several techniques that can improve the performance of CBS for MAPF_T, including stronger and generalised versions of existing symmetry-breaking constraints and a novel pruning technique that eliminates redundant branches in the CBS constraint tree. Experimental results on six popular MAPF domains show convincing improvements for CBS success rate and substantial reductions in node expansions and runtime.