Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oltea Mihaela Herescu

dblp:47/805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory › concurrent systems
concurrent algorithms
0.012001
On the generalized dining philosophers problem · PODC 2001
Distributed computing theory › mutual exclusion
dining philosophers
0.012001
On the generalized dining philosophers problem · PODC 2001
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms
0.012001
On the generalized dining philosophers problem · PODC 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized priority assignment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 A randomized encoding of the Pi-calculus with mixed choice
Catuscia Palamidessi, Oltea Mihaela Herescu
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2001 On the generalized dining philosophers problem
abstract
We consider a generalization of the dining philosophers problem to arbitrary connection topologies. We focus on symmetric, fully distributed systems, and we address the problem of guaranteeing progress and lockout-freedom, even in presence of adversary schedulers, by using randomized algorithms. We show that the well-known algorithms of Lehmann and Rabin do not work in the generalized case, and we propose an alternative algorithm based on the idea of letting the philosophers assign a random priority to their adjacent forks.
Oltea Mihaela Herescu, Catuscia Palamidessi
PODC1
2000 Probabilistic Asynchronous pi-Calculus
Oltea Mihaela Herescu, Catuscia Palamidessi
FoSSaCS1