Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruipeng Liu
dblp:47/8194
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
linear threshold unit |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Feasibility of Single-Pass Full-Capacity Learning in Linear Threshold Neurons with Binary Input Vectors · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
span rules · 0.8linear programming · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Linearithmic Clean-up for Vector-Symbolic Key-Value Memory with Kroneker Rotation ProductsabstractA computational bottleneck in current Vector-Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) is the "clean-up" step, which decodes the noisy vectors retrieved from the architecture. Clean-up typically compares noisy vectors against a "codebook" of prototype vectors, incurring computational complexity that is quadratic or similar. We present a new codebook representation that supports efficient clean-up, based on Kroneker products of rotation-like matrices. The resulting clean-up time complexity is linearithmic, i.e. $\mathcal{O}(N\text{log}N)$, where $N$ is the vector dimension and also the number of vectors in the codebook. Clean-up space complexity is $\mathcal{O}(N)$. Furthermore, the codebook is not stored explicitly in computer memory: It can be represented in $\mathcal{O}(\text{log}N)$ space, and individual vectors in the codebook can be materialized in $\mathcal{O}(N)$ time. At the same time, asymptotic memory capacity remains comparable to standard approaches. Computer experiments confirm these results, demonstrating several orders of magnitude more scalability than baseline VSA techniques. Ruipeng Liu, Qinru Qiu, Simon Khan, Garrett E. Katz |
NeSy | 1 |
| 2024 | On the Feasibility of Single-Pass Full-Capacity Learning in Linear Threshold Neurons with Binary Input VectorsabstractKnown learning rules tend to fall near one of two extremes: single-pass associative learning with low complexity and capacity, and multi-pass iterative learning with high complexity and capacity. In this work we investigate the mathematical feasibility of learning rules that are both single-pass and achieve the theoretical upper bound on capacity. We consider a fairly broad family of learning rules we call “span rules,” which include known rules such as Hebbian learning, perceptron learning, and backpropagation as special cases. To our knowledge, previous work has not determined whether single-pass, full-capacity span rules exist, even in the most fundamental case of a linear threshold neuron with binary input vectors, which is the focus of this study. We derive a necessary condition for the existence of such learning rules, which takes the form of a linear program, and show that the linear program is infeasible. This establishes an impossibility result that span rules can not be both single-pass and full-capacity. Ruipeng Liu, Borui He, Naveed Tahir, Garrett E. Katz |
ICML | 1 |