Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Esther Salazar

dblp:47/8929 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 83% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data stream processing · 57% Data models and query languages · 43%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent factor model
0.422015
Integrating Features and Similarities: Flexible Models for Heterogeneous Multiview Data · AAAI 2015
Dynamic Rank Factor Model for Text Streams · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multi-view learning
0.212015
Integrating Features and Similarities: Flexible Models for Heterogeneous Multiview Data · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › factor analysis
dynamic factor model
0.212014
Dynamic Rank Factor Model for Text Streams · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › graphical model estimation
sparse graphical models
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › neuroimaging analysis
fMRI analysis
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.112012
Inferring Latent Structure From Mixed Real and Categorical Relational Data · ICML 2012
Data models and query languages
relational data
0.112012
Inferring Latent Structure From Mixed Real and Categorical Relational Data · ICML 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank factorization · 0.4von mises distribution · 0.3matrix factorization · 0.3latent binary features · 0.3bayesian modeling · 0.3mixed-type data modeling · 0.3variational inference · 0.2multiple kernel learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Integrating Features and Similarities: Flexible Models for Heterogeneous Multiview Data
abstract
We present a probabilistic framework for learning with heterogeneous multiview data where some views are given as ordinal, binary, or real-valued feature matrices, and some views as similarity matrices. Our framework has the following distinguishing aspects: (i) a unified latent factor model for integrating information from diverse feature (ordinal, binary, real) and similarity based views, and predicting the missing data in each view, leveraging view correlations; (ii) seamless adaptation to binary/multiclass classification where data consists of multiple feature and/or similarity-based views; and (iii) an efficient, variational inference algorithm which is especially flexible in modeling the views with ordinal-valued data (by learning the cutpoints for the ordinal data), and extends naturally to streaming data settings. Our framework subsumes methods such as multiview learning and multiple kernel learning as special cases. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework on several real-world and benchmarks datasets.
Wenzhao Lian, Piyush Rai, Esther Salazar, Lawrence Carin
AAAI3
2014 Dynamic Rank Factor Model for Text Streams
Shaobo Han, Esther Salazar, Lawrence Carin
NIPS3
2013 Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI
abstract
A new model is developed for joint analysis of ordered, categorical, real and count data. The ordered and categorical data are answers to questionnaires, the (word) count data correspond to the text questions from the questionnaires, and the real data correspond to fMRI responses for each subject. The Bayesian model employs the von Mises distribution in a novel manner to infer sparse graphical models jointly across people, questions, fMRI stimuli and brain region, with this integrated within a new matrix factorization based on latent binary features. The model is compared with simpler alternatives on two real datasets. We also demonstrate the ability to predict the response of the brain to visual stimuli (as measured by fMRI), based on knowledge of how the associated person answered classical questionnaires.
Esther Salazar, Ryan Bogdan, Adam Gorka, Ahmad Hariri, Lawrence Carin
ICML (2)1
2012 Inferring Latent Structure From Mixed Real and Categorical Relational Data
Esther Salazar, Lawrence Carin
ICML1