Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wojciech Jawor

dblp:48/1093 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 10 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 83% Mathematical optimization · 17%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.122007
Improved online algorithms for buffer management in QoS switches · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2007
Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help · SIAM J. Comput. 2007
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.122007
Improved online algorithms for buffer management in QoS switches · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2007
Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help · ICALP 2004
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online scheduling
0.122007
Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help · SIAM J. Comput. 2007
Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help · ICALP 2004
Internet architecture and protocols
packet scheduling
0.112007
Improved online algorithms for buffer management in QoS switches · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2007
Internet architecture and protocols
quality of service
0.112007
Improved online algorithms for buffer management in QoS switches · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2007
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms › online packing and covering
buffer management
0.112007
Improved online algorithms for buffer management in QoS switches · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2007
Mathematical optimization
scheduling
0.122007
Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help · ICALP 2004
Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help · SIAM J. Comput. 2007
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › machine scheduling
single-machine scheduling
0.012007
Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help · SIAM J. Comput. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound · 0.1competitive ratio analysis · 0.1restart · 0.1randomization · 0.1competitive ratio lower bounds · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Preemptive Online Scheduling: Optimal Algorithms for All Speeds
Tomás Ebenlendr, Wojciech Jawor, Jirí Sgall
Algorithmica2
2008 Experimental Analysis of Scheduling Algorithms for Aggregated Links
Wojciech Jawor, Marek Chrobak, Mart L. Molle
WAOA1
2008 Competitive Analysis of Scheduling Algorithms for Aggregated Links
Wojciech Jawor, Marek Chrobak, Christoph Dürr
Algorithmica1
2007 Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help
abstract
We consider the following scheduling problem. The input is a set of jobs with equal processing times, where each job is specified by its release time and deadline. The goal is to determine a single‐processor nonpreemptive schedule that maximizes the number of completed jobs. In the online version, each job arrives at its release time. We give two online algorithms with competitive ratios below 2 and show several lower bounds on the competitive ratios. First, we give a barely random $5/3$‐competitive algorithm that uses only one random bit. We also show a lower bound of $3/2$ on the competitive ratio of barely random algorithms that randomly choose one of two deterministic algorithms. If the two algorithms are selected with equal probability, we can further improve the bound to $8/5$. Second, we give a deterministic $3/2$‐competitive algorithm in the model that allows restarts, and we show that in this model the ratio $3/2$ is optimal. For randomized algorithms with restarts we show a lower bound of $6/5$.
Marek Chrobak, Wojciech Jawor, Jirí Sgall, Tomás Tichý
SIAM J. Comput.2
2007 Improved online algorithms for buffer management in QoS switches
abstract
We consider the following buffer management problem arising in QoS networks: Packets with specified weights and deadlines arrive at a network switch and need to be forwarded so that the total weight of forwarded packets is maximized. Packets not forwarded before their deadlines are lost. The main result of the article is an online 64/33 ≈ 1.939-competitive algorithm, the first deterministic algorithm for this problem with competitive ratio below 2. For the 2-uniform case we give an algorithm with ratio ≈ 1.377 and a matching lower bound.
Marek Chrobak, Wojciech Jawor, Jirí Sgall, Tomás Tichý
ACM Trans. Algorithms2
2006 Preemptive Online Scheduling: Optimal Algorithms for All Speeds
Tomás Ebenlendr, Wojciech Jawor, Jirí Sgall
ESA2
2006 Competitive Analysis of Scheduling Algorithms for Aggregated Links
Wojciech Jawor, Marek Chrobak, Christoph Dürr
LATIN1
2004 Improved Online Algorithms for Buffer Management in QoS Switches
Marek Chrobak, Wojciech Jawor, Jirí Sgall, Tomás Tichý
ESA2
2004 Online Scheduling of Equal-Length Jobs: Randomization and Restarts Help
Marek Chrobak, Wojciech Jawor, Jirí Sgall, Tomás Tichý
ICALP2
2004 Online Competitive Algorithms for Maximizing Weighted Throughput of Unit Jobs
Yair Bartal, Francis Y. L. Chin, Marek Chrobak, Stanley P. Y. Fung, Wojciech Jawor, Ron Lavi, Jirí Sgall, Tomás Tichý
STACS5