Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Michael Granski

dblp:48/1953 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 46% Electronic design automation · 23% Embedded and real-time systems · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › dataflow architecture
dataflow machine
0.011987
The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction scheduling
0.011987
The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › scheduling
operation scheduling
0.011987
The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
priority scheduling
0.011987
The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heuristic scheduling · 0.0critical path algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer
abstract
The effect of incorporating a priority scheme into a data flow computer is studied in this paper. Specifically, we deal with the scheduling of instructions in a data flow program, and the mechanisms by which such scheduling may be implemented within a data flow computer. We show that the assignment of priorities to data flow operations is a special case of a problem in scheduling theory, and also belongs to the NP-complete class of problems. Therefore, we develop a heuristic approach, based on the well-known Critical Path algorithm, as a basis for determining instruction priorities. Our conclusions, based on the simulation of programs executed in a modified data flow computer, show that adding a priority mechanism is not justifiable in the general case. This is due mostly to the inability to reach the potential improvement offered by scheduling operations, because of implementation restrictions. Nevertheless, certain algorithms (e. g., DFT) can still benefit from the proposed scheme, mainly because of their highly regular, static structure.
Michael Granski, Israel Koren, Gabriel M. Silberman
IEEE Trans. Computers1