EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Granski
dblp:48/1953
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 46% Electronic design automation · 23% Embedded and real-time systems · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › dataflow architecture
dataflow machine |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987 |
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › scheduling
operation scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
priority scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow Computer · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
heuristic scheduling · 0.0critical path algorithm · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | The Effect of Operation Scheduling on the Performance of a Data Flow ComputerabstractThe effect of incorporating a priority scheme into a data flow computer is studied in this paper. Specifically, we deal with the scheduling of instructions in a data flow program, and the mechanisms by which such scheduling may be implemented within a data flow computer. We show that the assignment of priorities to data flow operations is a special case of a problem in scheduling theory, and also belongs to the NP-complete class of problems. Therefore, we develop a heuristic approach, based on the well-known Critical Path algorithm, as a basis for determining instruction priorities. Our conclusions, based on the simulation of programs executed in a modified data flow computer, show that adding a priority mechanism is not justifiable in the general case. This is due mostly to the inability to reach the potential improvement offered by scheduling operations, because of implementation restrictions. Nevertheless, certain algorithms (e. g., DFT) can still benefit from the proposed scheme, mainly because of their highly regular, static structure. Michael Granski, Israel Koren, Gabriel M. Silberman |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |