Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark Patterson

dblp:48/3497 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 46% Robot navigation and mapping · 46% Motion planning and robot control · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
mapless navigation
0.012001
Real Time Robot Learning · ICRA 2001
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation
0.012001
Real Time Robot Learning · ICRA 2001
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning
0.012001
Real Time Robot Learning · ICRA 2001
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning
0.012001
Real Time Robot Learning · ICRA 2001
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
maze navigation
0.012001
Real Time Robot Learning · ICRA 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

q(lambda)-learning · 0.0dyna · 0.0computer vision · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Controller performance of marine robots in reminiscent oil surveys
abstract
A class of path following and formation controllers are implemented on marine robots performing autonomous surveys in regions polluted by crude oil during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The controllers enable the robots to follow lines and curves, and maintain formation collectively while measuring reminiscent crude oil along their paths. The controllers are mathematically sound with proven convergence and robustness. However, their performance in the surveying missions is affected by natural disturbances caused by wind and water currents, and constraints such as sensor inaccuracy, localization errors, and network delays. This paper evaluates the performance of our controllers based on data collected during a survey performed at Grand Isle, Louisiana. These results will provide guidance for mission designs and inspire the future developments of our marine robots used to perform autonomous environmental surveys.
Shayok Mukhopadhyay, Chuanfeng Wang, Steven Bradshaw, Valerie Bazie, Sean Maxon, Lisa Hicks, Mark Patterson, Fumin Zhang 0001
IROS7
2007 "Simple Rules for Editors"? Here Is One Rule to Tackle Neglected Problems of Publishing: Response from PLoS
abstract
We are grateful to the Drs. Erren for highlighting the concern that younger and less-experienced scientists are sometimes not given due credit for their contributions, in particular through omission from authorship on published articles. The Drs. Erren correctly point out that many journals including those published by PLoS do ask for all author contributions to be described on submission, and these contributions are also included in the published article. The corresponding author has ultimate responsibility for ensuring that these contributions are correct. Authorship issues are a topic of considerable debate among editorial groups such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). PLoS Medicine, for example, requires that each author on a paper respond to a specific e-mail to independently confirm their contribution to the work and whether they have any competing interests. No final decision is made on the paper until all authors have responded to that e-mail. This policy aims to ensure that all listed authors are able to justify their inclusion and to doublecheck for competing interests. Although it is not the role of editors to arbitrate authorship, on two occasions authors have agreed after receiving this e-mail request that they do not fulfil the criteria for authorship and have requested that they simply be acknowledged within the paper instead. In addition, PLoS Medicine specifically reminds authors on submission that all medical writers must be included on the paper with their contributions. PLoS is committed to ensuring that the byline on papers is correct and that the contribution statement accurately describes the contributions of authors. One way to reinforce to authors the importance of accurate authorship details is to strengthen our statement on submission forms and on author instructions for all journals, and to remind corresponding authors that they are ultimately responsible for confirming that no additional authors should be listed and that author contributions are accurate. It will also be interesting to see whether issues relating to authorship will be addressed with the commentary and annotation features that are available in the new journal PLoS ONE, and which will be applied to other PLoS journals in due course.
Mark Patterson, Barbara Cohen
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2001 Real Time Robot Learning
abstract
This paper presents the design, implementation and testing of a real-time system using computer vision and machine learning techniques to demonstrate learning behavior in a miniature mobile robot. The miniature robot, through environmental sensing, learns to navigate a maze choosing the optimum route. Several reinforcement learning based algorithms, such as the Q-learning, Q(/spl lambda/)-learning, fast online Q(/spl lambda/)-learning and DYNA structure, are considered. Experimental results based on simulation and an integrated real-time system are presented for varying density of obstacles in a 15/spl times/15 maze.
Bir Bhanu, Pat Leang, Chris Cowden, Yingqiang Lin, Mark Patterson
ICRA5