Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chunyu Kit

dblp:48/3888 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
26ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-6445-7400ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 22 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 70% Machine translation · 18% Language models and text generation · 10%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
short text topic modeling
0.212015
Short and Sparse Text Topic Modeling via Self-Aggregation · IJCAI 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.212015
Short and Sparse Text Topic Modeling via Self-Aggregation · IJCAI 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
constituency and dependency parsing
0.212013
Combine Constituent and Dependency Parsing via Reranking · IJCAI 2013
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
reranking
0.212013
Combine Constituent and Dependency Parsing via Reranking · IJCAI 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › parallel corpora
sentence alignment
0.212013
Non-Monotonic Sentence Alignment via Semisupervised Learning · ACL (1) 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.212013
Combine Constituent and Dependency Parsing via Reranking · IJCAI 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse coherence
lexical cohesion
0.112012
Extending Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics with Lexical Cohesion to Document Level · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation
0.112012
Extending Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics with Lexical Cohesion to Document Level · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
cross-lingual dependency parsing
0.112009
Cross Language Dependency Parsing using a Bilingual Lexicon · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.112009
Cross Language Dependency Parsing using a Bilingual Lexicon · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
semantic dependency parsing
0.112009
Semantic Dependency Parsing of NomBank and PropBank: An Efficient Integrated Approach via a Large-scale Feature Selection · EMNLP 2009
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.012013
Non-Monotonic Sentence Alignment via Semisupervised Learning · ACL (1) 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-aggregation · 0.2semi-supervised learning · 0.2feature selection · 0.1bilingual lexicon · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Multi-choice Relational Reasoning for Machine Reading Comprehension
abstract
This paper presents our study of cloze-style reading comprehension by imitating human reading comprehension, which normally involves tactical comparing and reasoning over candidates while choosing the best answer. We propose a multi-choice relational reasoning (McR2) model with an aim to enable relational reasoning on candidates based on fusion representations of document, query and candidates. For the fusion representations, we develop an efficient encoding architecture by integrating the schemes of bidirectional attention flow, self-attention and document-gated query reading. Then, comparing and inferring over candidates are executed by a novel relational reasoning network. We conduct extensive experiments on four datasets derived from two public corpora, Children’s Book Test and Who DiD What, to verify the validity and advantages of our model. The results show that it outperforms all baseline models significantly on the four benchmark datasets. The effectiveness of its key components is also validated by an ablation study.
Wuya Chen, Xiaojun Quan, Chunyu Kit, Zhengcheng Min, Jiahai Wang
COLING3
2015 Short and Sparse Text Topic Modeling via Self-Aggregation
Xiaojun Quan, Chunyu Kit, Yong Ge 0001, Sinno Jialin Pan
IJCAI2
2015 Learning bilingual distributed phrase represenations for statistical machine translation
Deyi Xiong, Min Zhang 0005, Chunyu Kit
MTSummit4
2015 Towards non-monotonic sentence alignment
Xiaojun Quan, Chunyu Kit
Inf. Sci.2
2013 Non-Monotonic Sentence Alignment via Semisupervised Learning
Xiaojun Quan, Chunyu Kit, Yan Song 0003
ACL (1)2
2013 Combine Constituent and Dependency Parsing via Reranking
Xiaona Ren, Xiao Chen 0014, Chunyu Kit
IJCAI3
2013 Integrative Semantic Dependency Parsing via Efficient Large-scale Feature Selection
abstract
Semantic parsing, i.e., the automatic derivation of meaning representation such as an instantiated predicate-argument structure for a sentence, plays a critical role in deep processing of natural language. Unlike all other top systems of semantic dependency parsing that have to rely on a pipeline framework to chain up a series of submodels each specialized for a specific subtask, the one presented in this article integrates everything into one model, in hopes of achieving desirable integrity and practicality for real applications while maintaining a competitive performance. This integrative approach tackles semantic parsing as a word pair classification problem using a maximum entropy classifier. We leverage adaptive pruning of argument candidates and large-scale feature selection engineering to allow the largest feature space ever in use so far in this field, it achieves a state-of-the-art performance on the evaluation data set for CoNLL-2008 shared task, on top of all but one top pipeline system, confirming its feasibility and effectiveness.
Hai Zhao 0001, Chunyu Kit
J. Artif. Intell. Res.3
2012 Extending Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics with Lexical Cohesion to Document Level
Billy Tak-Ming Wong, Chunyu Kit
EMNLP-CoNLL2
2011 Improving Part-of-speech Tagging for Context-free Parsing
Chunyu Kit
IJCNLP2
2011 Comparative Evaluation of Term Informativeness Measures in Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics
Billy Tak-Ming Wong, Chunyu Kit
MTSummit2
2011 Integrating unsupervised and supervised word segmentation: The role of goodness measures
Hai Zhao 0001, Chunyu Kit
Inf. Sci.2
2010 How Large a Corpus Do We Need: Statistical Method Versus Rule-based Method
Hai Zhao 0001, Yan Song 0003, Chunyu Kit
LREC3
2009 Cross Language Dependency Parsing using a Bilingual Lexicon
Hai Zhao 0001, Yan Song 0003, Chunyu Kit, Guodong Zhou 0001
ACL/IJCNLP3
2009 Semantic Dependency Parsing of NomBank and PropBank: An Efficient Integrated Approach via a Large-scale Feature Selection
Hai Zhao 0001, Wenliang Chen, Chunyu Kit
EMNLP3
2009 ATEC: automatic evaluation of machine translation via word choice and word order
Billy Tak-Ming Wong, Chunyu Kit
Mach. Transl.2
2008 Parsing Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies with Two Single-Stage Maximum Entropy Models
Hai Zhao 0001, Chunyu Kit
CoNLL2
2008 An Empirical Comparison of Goodness Measures for Unsupervised Chinese Word Segmentation with a Unified Framework
Hai Zhao 0001, Chunyu Kit
IJCNLP2
2008 Unsupervised Segmentation Helps Supervised Learning of Character Tagging for Word Segmentation and Named Entity Recognition
Hai Zhao 0001, Chunyu Kit
IJCNLP2
2008 An Improved Corpus Comparison Approach to Domain Specific Term Recognition
Chunyu Kit
PACLIC2
2008 Chinese word segmentation as morpheme-based lexical chunking
Guohong Fu, Chunyu Kit, Jonathan J. Webster
Inf. Sci.2
2008 Scaling Conditional Random Fields by One-Against-the-Other Decomposition
Hai Zhao 0001, Chunyu Kit
J. Comput. Sci. Technol.2
2006 Abbreviation Recognition with MaxEnt Model
Chunyu Kit, Xiaoyue Liu 0004, Jonathan J. Webster
CICLing1
2005 Period Disambiguation with Maxent Model
Chunyu Kit, Xiaoyue Liu 0004
IJCNLP1
2004 Unsupervised Segmentation of Chinese Corpus Using Accessor Variety
Haodi Feng, Kang Chen 0001, Chunyu Kit, Xiaotie Deng
IJCNLP3
2004 An Example-Based Study on Chinese Word Segmentation Using Critical Fragments
Qinan Hu, Haihua Pan, Chunyu Kit
IJCNLP3
1992 Tokenization As The Initial Phase In NLP
Jonathan J. Webster, Chunyu Kit
COLING2