Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shilpa Shukla

dblp:48/4691 · also Shilpa V. Shukla · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.112012
Parallelizing ListNet training using spark · SIGIR 2012
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
parallel learning to rank
0.112012
Parallelizing ListNet training using spark · SIGIR 2012
Distributed systems
distributed cluster computing
0.012012
Parallelizing ListNet training using spark · SIGIR 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spark · 0.3gradient descent · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 A Unique Arrangement: Organizing Collections for Digital Libraries, Archives, and Repositories
Jeff Crow, Luis Francisco-Revilla, April Norris, Shilpa Shukla, Ciaran B. Trace
TPDL4
2012 Parallelizing ListNet training using spark
abstract
As ever-larger training sets for learning to rank are created, scalability of learning has become increasingly important to achieving continuing improvements in ranking accuracy. Exploiting independence of "summation form" computations, we show how each iteration in ListNet gradient descent can benefit from parallel execution. We seek to draw the attention of the IR community to use Spark, a newly introduced distributed cluster computing system, for reducing training time of iterative learning to rank algorithms. Unlike MapReduce, Spark is especially suited for iterative and interactive algorithms. Our results show near linear reduction in ListNet training time using Spark on Amazon EC2 clusters.
Shilpa Shukla, Matthew Lease, Ambuj Tewari
SIGIR1
2002 Activity Theory and System Design: A View from the Trenches
Patricia Collins, Shilpa Shukla, David F. Redmiles
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work.2