Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Watcharin Leungwattanakit
dblp:48/4755
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Program verification · 97% Concurrent programming · 3% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 76% Parallel and multicore computing · 24% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
model checking |
0.4 | 3 | 2014 | Modular Software Model Checking for Distributed Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014 Model checking distributed systems by combining caching and process checkpointing · ASE 2011 Cache-Based Model Checking of Networked Applications: From Linear to Branching Time · ASE 2009 |
Program verification › model checking
modular model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Modular Software Model Checking for Distributed Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014 |
Program verification › model checking
software model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Modular Software Model Checking for Distributed Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014 |
Distributed systems
distributed system verification |
0.2 | 2 | 2014 | Model checking distributed systems by combining caching and process checkpointing · ASE 2011 Modular Software Model Checking for Distributed Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014 |
Program verification › model checking › software model checking
distributed system model checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Model checking distributed systems by combining caching and process checkpointing · ASE 2011 |
Parallel and multicore computing
concurrent system |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Modular Software Model Checking for Distributed Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014 |
Program verification › model checking
state space exploration |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Model checking distributed systems by combining caching and process checkpointing · ASE 2011 |
Concurrent programming
concurrency bugs |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Cache-Based Model Checking of Networked Applications: From Linear to Branching Time · ASE 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
checkpointing · 0.4cache-based model checking · 0.4state-space exploration strategies · 0.2process checkpointing · 0.2caching · 0.2state space exploration · 0.1backtracking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Modular Software Model Checking for Distributed SystemsabstractDistributed systems are complex, being usually composed of several subsystems running in parallel. Concurrent execution and inter-process communication in these systems are prone to errors that are difficult to detect by traditional testing, which does not cover every possible program execution. Unlike testing, model checking can detect such faults in a concurrent system by exploring every possible state of the system. However, most model-checking techniques require that a system be described in a modeling language. Although this simplifies verification, faults may be introduced in the implementation. Recently, some model checkers verify program code at runtime but tend to be limited to stand-alone programs. This paper proposes cache-based model checking, which relaxes this limitation to some extent by verifying one process at a time and running other processes in another execution environment. This approach has been implemented as an extension of Java PathFinder, a Java model checker. It is a scalable and promising technique to handle distributed systems. To support a larger class of distributed systems, a checkpointing tool is also integrated into the verification system. Experimental results on various distributed systems show the capability and scalability of cache-based model checking. Watcharin Leungwattanakit, Cyrille Artho, Masami Hagiya, Yoshinori Tanabe, Mitsuharu Yamamoto, Koichi Takahashi |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2011 | Model checking distributed systems by combining caching and process checkpointingabstractVerification of distributed software systems by model checking is not a straightforward task due to inter-process communication. Many software model checkers only explore the state space of a single multi-threaded process. Recent work proposes a technique that applies a cache to capture communication between the main process and its peers, and allows the model checker to complete state-space exploration. Although previous work handles non-deterministic output in the main process, any peer program is required to produce deterministic output. This paper introduces a process checkpointing tool. The combination of caching and process checkpointing makes it possible to handle non-determinism on both sides of communication. Peer states are saved as checkpoints and restored when the model checker backtracks and produces a request not available in the cache. We also introduce the concept of strategies to control the creation of checkpoints and the overhead caused by the checkpointing tool. Watcharin Leungwattanakit, Cyrille Artho, Masami Hagiya, Yoshinori Tanabe, Mitsuharu Yamamoto |
ASE | 1 |
| 2009 | Cache-Based Model Checking of Networked Applications: From Linear to Branching TimeabstractMany applications are concurrent and communicate over a network. The non-determinism in the thread and communication schedules makes it desirable to model check such systems. However, a simple state space exploration scheme is not applicable, as backtracking results in repeated communication operations. A cache-based approach solves this problem by hiding redundant communication operations from the environment. In this work, we propose a change from a linear-time to a branching-time cache, allowing us to relax restrictions in previous work regarding communication traces that differ between schedules. We successfully applied the new algorithm to real-life programs where a previous solution is not applicable. Cyrille Artho, Watcharin Leungwattanakit, Masami Hagiya, Yoshinori Tanabe, Mitsuharu Yamamoto |
ASE | 2 |