Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erling Seeberg

dblp:48/5043 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence similarity search
sequence database search
0.022000
Six-fold speed-up of Smith-Waterman sequence database searches using parallel processing on common microprocessors · Bioinform. 2000
SALSA: improved protein database searching by a new algorithm for assembly of sequence fragments into gapped alignments · Bioinform. 1998
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment › dynamic programming alignment
smith-waterman algorithm
0.012000
Six-fold speed-up of Smith-Waterman sequence database searches using parallel processing on common microprocessors · Bioinform. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models
0.012000
Six-fold speed-up of Smith-Waterman sequence database searches using parallel processing on common microprocessors · Bioinform. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing › data parallelism
SIMD vectorization
0.012000
Six-fold speed-up of Smith-Waterman sequence database searches using parallel processing on common microprocessors · Bioinform. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

SSE · 0.1SIMD · 0.1MMX · 0.1fragment assembly · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Six-fold speed-up of Smith-Waterman sequence database searches using parallel processing on common microprocessors
abstract
MOTIVATION: Sequence database searching is among the most important and challenging tasks in bioinformatics. The ultimate choice of sequence-search algorithm is that of Smith-Waterman. However, because of the computationally demanding nature of this method, heuristic programs or special-purpose hardware alternatives have been developed. Increased speed has been obtained at the cost of reduced sensitivity or very expensive hardware. RESULTS: A fast implementation of the Smith-Waterman sequence-alignment algorithm using Single-Instruction, Multiple-Data (SIMD) technology is presented. This implementation is based on the MultiMedia eXtensions (MMX) and Streaming SIMD Extensions (SSE) technology that is embedded in Intel's latest microprocessors. Similar technology exists also in other modern microprocessors. Six-fold speed-up relative to the fastest previously known Smith-Waterman implementation on the same hardware was achieved by an optimized 8-way parallel processing approach. A speed of more than 150 million cell updates per second was obtained on a single Intel Pentium III 500 MHz microprocessor. This is probably the fastest implementation of this algorithm on a single general-purpose microprocessor described to date.
Torbjørn Rognes, Erling Seeberg
Bioinform.2
1998 SALSA: improved protein database searching by a new algorithm for assembly of sequence fragments into gapped alignments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Optimal sequence alignment based on the Smith-Waterman algorithm is usually too computationally demanding to be practical for searching large sequence databases. Heuristic programs like FASTA and BLAST have been developed which run much faster, but at the expense of sensitivity. RESULTS: In an effort to approximate the sensitivity of an optimal alignment algorithm, a new algorithm has been devised for the computation of a gapped alignment of two sequences. After scanning for high-scoring words and extensions of these to form fragments of similarity, the algorithm uses dynamic programming to build an accurate alignment based on the fragments initially identified. The algorithm has been implemented in a program called SALSA and the performance has been evaluated on a set of test sequences. The sensitivity was found to be close to the Smith-Waterman algorithm, while the speed was similar to FASTA (ktup = 2). AVAILABILITY: Searches can be performed from the SALSA homepage at http://dna.uio.no/salsa/ using a wide range of databases. Source code and precompiled executables are also available. CONTACT: [email protected]
Torbjørn Rognes, Erling Seeberg
Bioinform.2