Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nitin Chawla

dblp:48/5406 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking
0.112008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential equivalence checking
0.112008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.012008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential equivalence checking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 The Orlando Project: A 28 nm FD-SOI Low Memory Embedded Neural Network ASIC
Giuseppe Desoli, Valeria Tomaselli, Emanuele Plebani, Giulio Urlini, Danilo Pau, Viviana D'Alto, Tommaso Majo, Fabio De Ambroggi, Thomas Boesch, Surinder Pal Singh, Elio Guidetti, Nitin Chawla
ACIVS12
2008 Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows
abstract
It has long been the practice to create models in C or C++ for architectural studies, software prototyping and RTL verification in the design of Systems-on-Chip (SoC). It is often the case that by the end of a design project, multiple C models exist for different uses. Since a lot of time is invested in ensuring the functional correctness of these models via their use in system-level simulations, they often become "golden" functional reference models. Design teams are moving towards leveraging these system-level models to reduce the time needed for design and verification of RTL. On the design side, the use of high-level synthesis tools to synthesize RTL from C/C++ models is gaining ground for certain classes of blocks within a design. On the verification front, temporal differences at interfaces and in internal states between system-level models and RTL prevent the use of combinational equivalence checkers. This paper focuses on the use of sequential equivalence checking to verify functional equivalence between system-level models and RTL and describes the challenges and vale of using it in system-level to RTL flows.
Pascal Urard, Asma Maalej, Roberto Guizzetti, Nitin Chawla
DAC4