Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William M. Wilson

dblp:48/573 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements analysis
natural language requirements analysis
0.011997
Automated Analysis of Requirement Specifications · ICSE 1997
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis
0.011997
Automated Analysis of Requirement Specifications · ICSE 1997
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements quality
requirements quality assessment
0.011997
Automated Analysis of Requirement Specifications · ICSE 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural language processing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Automated Analysis of Requirement Specifications
abstract
It is generally accepted that poorly written requirements can result in software with the wrong ftmctionality.The Goddard Space Flight Center's (GSFC) Software Assurance Technology Center (SATC) has developed .anearly life cycle tool for assessing requirements that are specified in natural language.The tool searches the document for terms the SATC has identified as quality indicators, e.g.weak phrases.The reports produced by the tool are used to identify specification statements and structural areas of the requirements specification document that need to be improved.The metrics are used by project managers to recognize and preclude potential areas of risk.
William M. Wilson, Linda H. Rosenberg, Lawrence E. Hyatt
ICSE1