Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henry Lu

dblp:48/5798 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
deformable object manipulation
0.212015
Learning force-based manipulation of deformable objects from multiple demonstrations · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › force control
force-based manipulation
0.212015
Learning force-based manipulation of deformable objects from multiple demonstrations · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.212015
Learning force-based manipulation of deformable objects from multiple demonstrations · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
variable impedance control
0.212015
Learning force-based manipulation of deformable objects from multiple demonstrations · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-rigid registration · 0.2learning from demonstration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Learning force-based manipulation of deformable objects from multiple demonstrations
abstract
Manipulation of deformable objects often requires a robot to apply specific forces to bring the object into the desired configuration. For instance, tightening a knot requires pulling on the ends, flattening an article of clothing requires smoothing out wrinkles, and erasing a whiteboard requires applying downward pressure. We present a method for learning force-based manipulation skills from demonstrations. Our approach uses non-rigid registration to compute a warping function that transforms both the end-effector poses and forces in each demonstration into the current scene, based on the configuration of the object. Our method then uses the variation between the demonstrations to extract a single trajectory, along with time-varying feedback gains that determine how much to match poses or forces. This results in a learned variable-impedance control strategy that trades off force and position errors, providing for the right level of compliance that applies the necessary forces at each stage of the motion. We evaluate our approach by tying knots in rope, flattening towels, and erasing a whiteboard.
Alex X. Lee, Henry Lu, Abhishek Gupta 0004, Sergey Levine, Pieter Abbeel
ICRA2
2015 Learning from multiple demonstrations using trajectory-aware non-rigid registration with applications to deformable object manipulation
abstract
Learning from demonstration by means of non-rigid point cloud registration is an effective tool for learning to manipulate a wide range of deformable objects. However, most methods that use non-rigid registration to transfer demonstrated trajectories assume that the test and demonstration scene are structurally very similar, with any variation explained by a non-linear transformation. In real-world tasks with clutter and distractor objects, this assumption is unrealistic. In this work, we show that a trajectory-aware non-rigid registration method that uses multiple demonstrations to focus the registration process on points that are relevant to the task can effectively handle significantly greater visual variation than prior methods that are not trajectory-aware. We demonstrate that this approach achieves superior generalization on several challenging tasks, including towel folding and grasping objects in a box containing irrelevant distractors.
Alex X. Lee, Abhishek Gupta 0004, Henry Lu, Sergey Levine, Pieter Abbeel
IROS3