Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paolo Carlo Pomi

dblp:48/593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › self-adaptive systems › autonomic computing
auto-configuration
0.112011
Automatic (Re)Configuration of IT Systems for Dependability · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ontology-based modeling · 0.2model transformation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Automatic (Re)Configuration of IT Systems for Dependability
abstract
This paper proposes an approach for automatic, service-driven configuration of networked IT systems focused on achieving a specific set of dependability properties. An automatic process starts from a service-level model to generate dependable configurations for the managed IT infrastructure. The process uses an ontology to model the services and their dependability requirements, the IT infrastructure, the available dependability mechanisms, and their configuration. Configurations are computed by model transformation rules which implement various dependability strategies with different degrees of requirements' satisfaction. Alternative configurations are generated to allow reconfiguring the system taking into account incidents or other operational conditions. A sample system hosting services based on web technologies is used as a proof-of-concept to illustrate application and extent of our approach.
Marco Domenico Aime, Antonio Lioy, Paolo Carlo Pomi
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.3
2008 Integrating Deployment Techniques with Monitoring: The Proactive Configuration Checker (PCC)
abstract
Assuring security in distributed systems is a complex issue, nowadays getting more and more sensitive, because important services are exposed using Internet. Moreover, new concepts must be considered by computer scientists: resilience, maintainability and availability. One of the first consequences of successful attacks or management errors is the modification of configurations. While tools already exist able to check whether configurations are correct and compliant, there is no integration of these techniques with policy specification and related deployment. In this paper, it is presented the Proactive Configuration Checker (PCC), a tool designed to test configurations for modification that takes advantage from an integrated approach, starting from policy specification to automatic deployment, in order to detect attacks, while reducing false positives.
Cataldo Basile, Paolo Carlo Pomi, Piervito Scaglioso
PDP2