Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

N. Prunella

dblp:48/6176 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.021993
FASTPAT: a fast and efficient algorithm for string searching in DNA sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993
SIMD parallelization of the WORDUP algorithm for detecting statistically significant patterns in DNA sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
pattern matching
0.011993
SIMD parallelization of the WORDUP algorithm for detecting statistically significant patterns in DNA sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms › string matching
boyer-moore algorithm
0.011993
FASTPAT: a fast and efficient algorithm for string searching in DNA sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
string matching
0.011993
FASTPAT: a fast and efficient algorithm for string searching in DNA sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data compression · 0.0boyer-moore method · 0.0boyer-moore algorithm · 0.0SIMD parallelization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 SIMD parallelization of the WORDUP algorithm for detecting statistically significant patterns in DNA sequences
abstract
The development of new techniques in sequencing nuclei acids has produced a great amount of sequence data and has led to the discovery of new relationships. In this paper, we study a method for parallelizing the algorithm WORDUP, which detects the presence of statistically significant patterns in DNA sequences. WORDUP implements an efficient method to identify the presence of statistically significant oligomers in a non-homologous group of sequences. It is based on a modified version of the Boyer-Moore algorithm, which is one of the fastest algorithms for string matching available in the literature. The aim of the parallel version of WORDUP presented here is to speed up the computational time and allow the analysis of a greater set of longer nucleotide sequences, which is usually impractical with sequential algorithms.
Sabino Liuni, N. Prunella, Graziano Pesole, Tiziana D'Orazio, Ettore Stella, Arcangelo Distante
Comput. Appl. Biosci.2
1993 FASTPAT: a fast and efficient algorithm for string searching in DNA sequences
abstract
A new string searching algorithm is presented aimed at searching for the occurrence of character patterns in longer character texts. The algorithm, specifically designed for nucleic acid sequence data, is essentially derived from the Boyer-Moore method (Comm. ACM, 20, 762-772, 1977). Both pattern and text data are compressed so that the natural 4-letter alphabet of nucleic acid sequences is considerably enlarged. The string search starts from the last character of the pattern and proceeds in large jumps through the text to be searched. The data compression and searching algorithm allows one to avoid searching for patterns not present in the text as well as to inspect, for each pattern, all text characters until the exact match with the text is found. These considerations are supported by empirical evidence and comparisons with other methods.
N. Prunella, Sabino Liuni, Marcella Attimonelli, Graziano Pesole
Comput. Appl. Biosci.1