Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph D. Blackburn

dblp:48/6801 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › developer studies › developer behavior
developer productivity
0.011996
Improving Speed and Productivity of Software Development: A Global Survey of Software Developers · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1996
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.011996
Improving Speed and Productivity of Software Development: A Global Survey of Software Developers · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.0cross-national comparison · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Improving Speed and Productivity of Software Development: A Global Survey of Software Developers
abstract
Time is an essential measure of performance in software development because time delays tend to fall directly to the bottom line. To address this issue, this research seeks to distinguish time-based software development practices: those managerial actions that result in faster development speed and higher productivity. This study is based upon a survey of software management practices in Western Europe and builds upon an earlier study we carried out in the United States and Japan (Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, 1996). We measure the extent to which managers in the USA, Japan and Europe differ in their management of software projects and also determine the tools, technology and practices that separate fast and slow developers in Western Europe.
Joseph D. Blackburn, Gary D. Scudder, Luk N. Van Wassenhove
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1