Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Masoumeh T. Izadi

dblp:48/7035 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 40% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation
0.122005
Model minimization by linear PSR · IJCAI 2005
A Planning Algorithm for Predictive State Representations · IJCAI 2003
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.112005
Using core beliefs for point-based value iteration · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
point-based value iteration
0.112005
Using core beliefs for point-based value iteration · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
planning algorithms
0.012003
A Planning Algorithm for Predictive State Representations · IJCAI 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.1point-based value iteration · 0.1linear predictive state representation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Quantifying the determinants of outbreak detection performance through simulation and machine learning
Nastaran Jafarpour, Masoumeh T. Izadi, Doina Precup, David L. Buckeridge
J. Biomed. Informatics2
2013 Using Hierarchical Mixture of Experts Model for Fusion of Outbreak Detection Methods
Nastaran Jafarpour, Doina Precup, Masoumeh T. Izadi, David L. Buckeridge
AMIA3
2013 Assessing the Predictability of Hospital Readmission Using Machine Learning
abstract
Unplanned hospital readmissions raise health care costs and cause significant distress to patients. Hence, predicting which patients are at risk to be readmitted is of great interest. In this paper, we mine large amounts of administrative information from claim data, including patients demographics, dispensed drugs, medical or surgical procedures performed, and medical diagnosis, in order to predict readmission using supervised learning methods. Our objective is to gain knowledge about the predictive power of the available information. Our preliminary results on data from the provincial hospital system in Quebec illustrate the potential for this approach to reveal important information on factors that trigger hospital readmission. Our findings suggest that a substantial portion of readmissions is inherently hard to predict. Consequently, the use of the raw readmission rate as an indicator of the quality of provided care might not be appropriate.
Arian Hosseinzadeh, Masoumeh T. Izadi, Aman Verma, Doina Precup, David L. Buckeridge
IAAI2
2009 A Bayesian Network Model for Analysis of Detection Performance in Surveillance Systems
Masoumeh T. Izadi, David L. Buckeridge, Anya Okhmatovskaia, Samson W. Tu, Martin J. O'Connor, Csongor Nyulas, Mark A. Musen
AMIA1
2009 Sensitivity Analysis of POMDP Value Functions
abstract
In sequential decision making under uncertainty, as in many other modeling endeavors, researchers observe a dynamical system and collect data measuring its behavior over time. These data are often used to build models that explain relationships between the measured variables, and are eventually used for planning and control purposes. However, these measurements cannot always be exact, systems can change over time, and discovering these facts or fixing these problems is not always feasible. Therefore it is important to formally describe the degree to which the model can tolerate noise, in order to keep near optimal behavior. The problem of finding tolerance bounds has been the focus of many studies for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) due to their usefulness in practical applications. In this paper, we consider Partially Observable MDPs (POMDPs), which is a more realistic extension of MDPs with a wider scope of applications. We address two types of perturbations in POMDP model parameters, namely additive and multiplicative, and provide theoretical bounds for the impact of these changes in the value function. Experimental results are provided to illustrate our POMDP perturbation analysis in practice.
Stéphane Ross, Masoumeh T. Izadi, Mark Mercer, David L. Buckeridge
ICMLA2
2008 Prediction-Directed Compression of POMDPs
abstract
High dimensionality of belief space in partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) is one of the major causes that severely restricts the applicability of this model. Previous studies have demonstrated that the dimensionality of a POMDP can eventually be reduced by transforming it into an equivalent predictive state representation (PSR). In this paper, we address the problem of finding an approximate and compact PSR model corresponding to a given POMDP model. We formulate this problem in an optimization framework. Our algorithm tries to minimize the potential error that missing some core tests may cause. We also present an empirical evaluation on benchmark problems, illustrating the performance of this approach.
Abdeslam Boularias, Masoumeh T. Izadi, Brahim Chaib-draa
ICMLA2
2007 Optimizing Anthrax Outbreak Detection Using Reinforcement Learning
Masoumeh T. Izadi, David L. Buckeridge
AAAI1
2007 Decision Theoretic Analysis of Improving Epidemic Detection
Masoumeh T. Izadi, David L. Buckeridge
AMIA1
2005 Using Rewards for Belief State Updates in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes
Masoumeh T. Izadi, Doina Precup
ECML1
2005 Model minimization by linear PSR
Masoumeh T. Izadi, Doina Precup
IJCAI1
2005 Using core beliefs for point-based value iteration
Masoumeh T. Izadi, Ajit V. Rajwade 0002, Doina Precup
IJCAI1
2003 A Planning Algorithm for Predictive State Representations
Masoumeh T. Izadi, Doina Precup
IJCAI1