Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David L. Hall

dblp:48/788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-2258-3695ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image enhancement
contrast enhancement
0.011971
A Survey of Preprocessing and Feature Extraction Techniques for Radiographic Images · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Image and video processing
feature extraction
0.011971
A Survey of Preprocessing and Feature Extraction Techniques for Radiographic Images · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Image and video processing
image preprocessing
0.011971
A Survey of Preprocessing and Feature Extraction Techniques for Radiographic Images · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

template matching · 0.0digital spatial filtering · 0.0contour tracing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Hard sensor fusion for COIN inspired situation awareness
Matthew S. Baran, Donald J. Natale, Richard L. Tutwiler, Christopher Griffin 0001, John M. Daughtry, Matthew M. McQuillan, Jeffrey C. Rimland, David L. Hall
FUSION8
2011 A COIN-inspired synthetic dataset for qualitative evaluation of hard and soft fusion systems
Jacob L. Graham, David L. Hall, Jeffrey C. Rimland
FUSION2
2010 Test and evaluation of soft/hard information fusion systems: A test environment, methodology and initial data sets
David L. Hall, Jacob L. Graham, Loretta D. More, Jeffrey C. Rimland
FUSION1
2010 A Multi-Disciplinary University Research Initiative in Hard and Soft information fusion: Overview, research strategies and initial results
James Llinas, Rakesh Nagi, David L. Hall, John Lavery
FUSION3
2009 A cyber infrastructure for evaluating the performance of human centered fusion
David L. Hall, Michael D. McNeese, Ben Hellar, Brian J. Panulla, Wade Shumaker
FUSION1
2008 Perspectives on visualization and virtual world technologies for multi-sensor data fusion
Cristin M. Hall, Sonya A. H. McMullen, David L. Hall, Mac J. McMullen, Bart Pursel
FUSION3
2008 A framework for dynamic hard/soft fusion
David L. Hall, Michael D. McNeese, James Llinas, Tracy Mullen
FUSION1
2007 On the utilization of market-based auction techniques for dynamic resource allocation in distributed sensor network systems
abstract
The rapid evolution of distributed sensor systems involving multiple heterogeneous sensors, the combination of mobile and stationary sensors, and dynamic information requirements presents a challenge for system resource utilization. On one hand, evolving standards and service oriented architecture concepts enables creation and use of multiple sensors and resources (including human reports). These technologies allow sensors and sources to be treated as Web services that can join the network at any time. On the other hand, traditional methods for optimizing these dynamic resources (e.g., classic optimization methods) are not feasible when the information requirements are rapidly changing, when there are multiple consumers of the requested information, and when the resources may dynamically appear (or disappear) from availability. This paper describes the concept of using a market-based approach for resource allocation. In this approach, sensors and network communications resources are treated as suppliers and human users (and data fusion algorithms) are treated as consumers. Dynamic auction methods are used to seek to match the dynamic information needs of the consumers with the capabilities of the suppliers. The "value" of the information to consumers is based on quantities such as accuracy, level of specificity, timeliness, etc. The paper describes the overall approach and presents results of numerical simulations.
David L. Hall, Tracy Mullen
FUSION1
1997 An introduction to multisensor data fusion
abstract
Multisensor data fusion is an emerging technology applied to Department of Defense (DoD) areas such as automated target recognition, battlefield surveillance, and guidance and control of autonomous vehicles, and to non-DoD applications such as monitoring of complex machinery, medical diagnosis, and smart buildings. Techniques for multisensor data fusion are drawn from a wide range of areas including artificial intelligence, pattern recognition, statistical estimation and other areas. This paper provides a tutorial on data fusion, introducing data fusion applications, process models, and identification of applicable techniques. Comments are made on the state-of-the-art in data fusion.
David L. Hall, James Llinas
Proc. IEEE1
1971 A Survey of Preprocessing and Feature Extraction Techniques for Radiographic Images
abstract
Feature extraction is one of the more difficult steps in image pattern recognition. Some sources of difficulty are the presence of irrelevant information and the relativity of a feature set to a particular application. Several preprocessing techniques for enhancing selected features and removing irrelevant data are described and compared. The techniques include gray level distribution linearization, digital spatial filtering, contrast enhancement, and image subtraction. Also, several feature extraction techniques are illustrated. The techniques are divided into spatial and Fourier domain operations. The spatial domain operations of directional signatures and contour tracing are first described. Then, the Fourier domain techniques of frequency signatures and template matching are illustrated. Finally, a practical image pattern recognition problem is solved using some of the described techniques.
Ernest L. Hall, Richard P. Kruger, Samuel J. Dwyer III, David L. Hall, Robert W. Mclaren, Gwilyu S. Lodwick
IEEE Trans. Computers4