Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shant Chandrakar

dblp:48/9083 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 87% Electronic design automation · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › FPGA architecture
configurable logic block
0.212015
Enhancements in UltraScale CLB Architecture · FPGA 2015
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA architecture
0.212015
Enhancements in UltraScale CLB Architecture · FPGA 2015
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.112015
Enhancements in UltraScale CLB Architecture · FPGA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

architecture evaluation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Enhancements in UltraScale CLB Architecture
abstract
Each generation of FPGA architecture benefits from optimizations around its technology node and target usage. In this paper, we discuss some of the changes made to the CLB for Xilinx's 20nm UltraScale product family. We motivate those changes and demonstrate better results than previous CLB architectures on a variety of metrics. We show that, in demanding scenarios, logic placed in an UltraScale device requires 16% less wirelength than 7-series. Designs mapped to UltraScale devices also require fewer logic tiles. In this paper, we demonstrate the utilization benefits of the UltraScale CLB attributed to certain CLB enhancements. The enhancements described herein result in an average packing improvement of 3% for the example design suite. We also show that the UltraScale architecture handles aggressive, tighter packing more gracefully than previous generations of FPGA. These significant reductions in wirelength and CLB counts translate directly into power, performance and ease-of-use benefits.
Shant Chandrakar, Dinesh Gaitonde, Trevor Bauer
FPGA1