Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bernhard X. Kausler

dblp:48/9772 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 26% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 26%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
discrete energy minimization
0.422015
A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Structured Discrete Energy Minimization Problems · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015
A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Discrete Energy Minimization Problems · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking
0.322013
Conservation Tracking · ICCV 2013
A Discrete Chain Graph Model for 3d+t Cell Tracking with High Misdetection Robustness · ECCV (3) 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.212015
A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Structured Discrete Energy Minimization Problems · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.212015
A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Structured Discrete Energy Minimization Problems · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › biomedical tracking
cell tracking
0.212013
Conservation Tracking · ICCV 2013
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
energy minimization
0.212013
A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Discrete Energy Minimization Problems · CVPR 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
markov random field inference
0.212013
A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Discrete Energy Minimization Problems · CVPR 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell tracking
0.112012
A Discrete Chain Graph Model for 3d+t Cell Tracking with High Misdetection Robustness · ECCV (3) 2012
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.112012
A Discrete Chain Graph Model for 3d+t Cell Tracking with High Misdetection Robustness · ECCV (3) 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

energy minimization · 0.4discrete chain graph model · 0.3inference techniques · 0.2inference technique · 0.2probabilistic graphical model · 0.2polyhedral methods · 0.2linear programming relaxation · 0.2integer programming · 0.2global optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Structured Discrete Energy Minimization Problems
Jörg H. Kappes, Bjoern Andres, Fred A. Hamprecht, Christoph Schnörr, Sebastian Nowozin, Dhruv Batra, Sungwoong Kim, Bernhard X. Kausler, Thorben Kröger, Jan Lellmann, Nikos Komodakis, Bogdan Savchynskyy, Carsten Rother
Int. J. Comput. Vis.8
2013 A Comparative Study of Modern Inference Techniques for Discrete Energy Minimization Problems
abstract
Even years ago, Szeliski et al. published an influential study on energy minimization methods for Markov random fields (MRF). This study provided valuable insights in choosing the best optimization technique for certain classes of problems. While these insights remain generally useful today, the phenominal success of random field models means that the kinds of inference problems we solve have changed significantly. Specifically, the models today often include higher order interactions, flexible connectivity structures, large label-spaces of different cardinalities, or learned energy tables. To reflect these changes, we provide a modernized and enlarged study. We present an empirical comparison of 24 state-of-art techniques on a corpus of 2,300 energy minimization instances from 20 diverse computer vision applications. To ensure reproducibility, we evaluate all methods in the OpenGM2 framework and report extensive results regarding runtime and solution quality. Key insights from our study agree with the results of Szeliski et al. for the types of models they studied. However, on new and challenging types of models our findings disagree and suggest that polyhedral methods and integer programming solvers are competitive in terms of runtime and solution quality over a large range of model types.
Jörg H. Kappes, Bjoern Andres, Fred A. Hamprecht, Christoph Schnörr, Sebastian Nowozin, Dhruv Batra, Sungwoong Kim, Bernhard X. Kausler, Jan Lellmann, Nikos Komodakis, Carsten Rother
CVPR8
2013 Conservation Tracking
abstract
The quality of any tracking-by-assignment hinges on the accuracy of the foregoing target detection / segmentation step. In many kinds of images, errors in this first stage are unavoidable. These errors then propagate to, and corrupt, the tracking result. Our main contribution is the first probabilistic graphical model that can explicitly account for over- and under segmentation errors even when the number of tracking targets is unknown and when they may divide, as in cell cultures. The tracking model we present implements global consistency constraints for the number of targets comprised by each detection and is solved to global optimality on reasonably large 2D+t and 3D+t datasets. In addition, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of a post processing that allows to establish target identity even across occlusion / under segmentation. The usefulness and efficiency of this new tracking method is demonstrated on three different and challenging 2D+t and 3D+t datasets from developmental biology.
Martin Schiegg, Philipp Hanslovsky, Bernhard X. Kausler, Lars Hufnagel, Fred A. Hamprecht
ICCV3
2012 A Discrete Chain Graph Model for 3d+t Cell Tracking with High Misdetection Robustness
Bernhard X. Kausler, Martin Schiegg, Bjoern Andres, Martin S. Lindner, Ullrich Köthe, Heike Leitte, Jochen Wittbrodt, Lars Hufnagel, Fred A. Hamprecht
ECCV (3)1