EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Erdmann
dblp:49/125
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 97% Motion planning and robot control · 3% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed computing theory
impossibility results |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stateless Computation · PODC 2017 |
Distributed computing theory
self-stabilization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stateless Computation · PODC 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › formal semantics
operational semantics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A Formalism and Method for Representing and Reasoning with Process Models Authored by Subject Matter Experts · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2013 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
process models |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A Formalism and Method for Representing and Reasoning with Process Models Authored by Subject Matter Experts · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2013 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A framework and computer system for knowledge-level acquisition, representation, and reasoning with process knowledge · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2010 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
code generation from models |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | A Formalism and Method for Representing and Reasoning with Process Models Authored by Subject Matter Experts · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2013 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Randomization in robot tasks · ICRA 1990 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
motion planning under uncertainty |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Randomization in robot tasks · ICRA 1990 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
feedback control |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Randomization in robot tasks · ICRA 1990 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Randomization in robot tasks · ICRA 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
f-logic · 0.3hardness proof · 0.3knowledge-level modeling · 0.1randomization · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Melanoma 2.0. Skin cancer as a paradigm for emerging diagnostic technologies, computational modelling and artificial intelligenceabstractWe live in an unprecedented time in oncology. We have accumulated samples and cases in cohorts larger and more complex than ever before. New technologies are available for quantifying solid or liquid samples at the molecular level. At the same time, we are now equipped with the computational power necessary to handle this enormous amount of quantitative data. Computational models are widely used helping us to substantiate and interpret data. Under the label of systems and precision medicine, we are putting all these developments together to improve and personalize the therapy of cancer. In this review, we use melanoma as a paradigm to present the successful application of these technologies but also to discuss possible future developments in patient care linked to them. Melanoma is a paradigmatic case for disruptive improvements in therapies, with a considerable number of metastatic melanoma patients benefiting from novel therapies. Nevertheless, a large proportion of patients does not respond to therapy or suffers from adverse events. Melanoma is an ideal case study to deploy advanced technologies not only due to the medical need but also to some intrinsic features of melanoma as a disease and the skin as an organ. From the perspective of data acquisition, the skin is the ideal organ due to its accessibility and suitability for many kinds of advanced imaging techniques. We put special emphasis on the necessity of computational strategies to integrate multiple sources of quantitative data describing the tumour at different scales and levels. Julio Vera, Xin Lai 0002, Andreas Baur, Michael Erdmann, Shailendra K. Gupta, Cristiano Guttà, Lucie Heinzerling, Markus V. Heppt, Philipp Maximilian Kazmierczak, Manfred Kunz, Christopher Lischer, Brigitte M. Pützer, Markus Rehm 0001, Christian Ostalecki, Jimmy Retzlaff, Stephan Witt, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Carola Berking |
Briefings Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2017 | Stateless ComputationabstractWe present and explore a model of stateless and self-stabilizing distributed computation, inspired by real-world applications such as routing on today's Internet. Processors in our model do not have an internal state, but rather interact by repeatedly mapping incoming messages ("labels") to outgoing messages and output values. While seemingly too restrictive to be of interest, stateless computation encompasses both classical game-theoretic notions of strategic interaction and a broad range of practical applications (e.g., Internet protocols, circuits, diffusion of technologies in social networks). Our main technical contribution is a general impossibility result for stateless self-stabilization in our model, showing that even modest asynchrony (with wait times that are linear in the number of processors) can prevent a stateless protocol from reaching a stable global configuration. Furthermore, we present hardness results for verifying stateless self-stabilization. We also address several aspects of the computational power of stateless protocols. Most significantly, we show that short messages (of length that is logarithmic in the number of processors) yield substantial computational power, even on very poorly connected topologies. Danny Dolev, Michael Erdmann, Neil Lutz, Michael Schapira, Adva Zair |
PODC | 2 |
| 2013 | Training Principle-Based Self-Explanations: Transfer to New Learning Contents
Alexander Renkl, Judith Solymosi, Michael Erdmann, Vincent Aleven |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2013 | A Formalism and Method for Representing and Reasoning with Process Models Authored by Subject Matter ExpertsabstractEnabling Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to formulate knowledge without the intervention of Knowledge Engineers (KEs) requires providing SMEs with methods and tools that abstract the underlying knowledge representation and allow them to focus on modeling activities. Bridging the gap between SME-authored models and their representation is challenging, especially in the case of complex knowledge types like processes, where aspects like frame management, data, and control flow need to be addressed. In this paper, we describe how SME-authored process models can be provided with an operational semantics and grounded in a knowledge representation language like F-logic to support process-related reasoning. The main results of this work include a formalism for process representation and a mechanism for automatically translating process diagrams into executable code following such formalism. From all the process models authored by SMEs during evaluation 82 percent were well formed, all of which executed correctly. Additionally, the two optimizations applied to the code generation mechanism produced a performance improvement at reasoning time of 25 and 30 percent with respect to the base case, respectively. José Manuél Gómez-Pérez, Michael Erdmann, Mark Greaves, Óscar Corcho |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 2 |
| 2010 | F-Logic#: Loosely Coupling F-Logic Rules and OntologiesabstractIn W3C's Rule Interchange Format (RIF), F-Logic rules have received considerable attention as a major logical rule formalism, while combinations of rules with Description Logic (DL) ontologies in RIF, let alone with F-Logic rules, are far less developed. To mend this, we first present F-Logic# knowledge bases, a framework based on the semantics of the well-investigated dl-programs, that provides a loose coupling approach to integrating F-Logic rules and DL ontologies by allowing rules to query the ontology using external atoms. We investigate the semantical properties of this framework and define a stratified fragment that allows for fast reasoning - a necessity on a Web with large amounts of data. We then shape F-Logic# as a RIF dialect, setting it firmly in a Web context and providing an expressive combination of F-Logic rules with DL ontologies in RIF. Finally, we show how to extend the F-Logic rule engine OntoBroker towards reasoning with F-Logic#, enabling as such a first commercial implementation for loosely-coupled ontologies and rules. Stijn Heymans, Roman Korf, Michael Erdmann, Jörg Pührer, Thomas Eiter |
Web Intelligence | 3 |
| 2010 | A framework and computer system for knowledge-level acquisition, representation, and reasoning with process knowledge
José Manuél Gómez-Pérez, Michael Erdmann, Mark Greaves, Óscar Corcho, V. Richard Benjamins |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 2 |
| 2007 | Applying problem solving methods for process knowledge acquisition, representation, and reasoningabstractIn this paper we present an approach towards knowledgeacquisition of process knowledge for the natural sciences.The work has been conducted within Project Halo, whichis creating advanced knowledge authoring and questionanswering systems for the natural sciences. An analysis of AP®-level questions for Biology, Chemistry and Physicsuncovered that process knowledge is the single most frequenttype of knowledge required. Thus, we developedmeans to acquire process knowledge, to formally representit, and to reason about it in order to answer novel questionsabout the domains.All these tasks are supported by an abstract process metamodel.It provides the terminology for user-tailored processdiagrams, which are automatically translated into executableFLogic code. The meta-model and the code generationare based on the notion of Problem Solving Methods(PSM) which represent an abstract formalization of thereasoning strategies needed for processes. José Manuél Gómez-Pérez, Michael Erdmann, Mark Greaves |
K-CAP | 2 |
| 2002 | OntoEdit: Collaborative Ontology Development for the Semantic Web
York Sure-Vetter, Michael Erdmann, Jürgen Angele, Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer, Dirk Wenke |
ISWC | 2 |
| 2001 | How to structure and access XML documents with ontologies
Michael Erdmann, Rudi Studer |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 1 |
| 2000 | OIL in a Nutshell
Dieter Fensel, Ian Horrocks 0001, Frank van Harmelen, Stefan Decker, Michael Erdmann, Michel C. A. Klein |
EKAW | 5 |
| 2000 | Semantic community Web portals
Steffen Staab, Jürgen Angele, Stefan Decker, Michael Erdmann, Andreas Hotho, Alexander Maedche, Hans-Peter Schnurr, Rudi Studer, York Sure-Vetter |
Comput. Networks | 4 |
| 2000 | Lessons Learned from Applying AI to the WebabstractOntobroker applies Artificial Intelligence techniques to improve access to heterogeneous, distributed and semi-structured information sources as they are presented in the World Wide Web or organization-wide intranets. It relies on the use of ontologies to annotate web pages, formulate queries and derive answers. In this paper we will briefly sketch Ontobroker. Then we will discuss its main shortcomings, i.e. we will share the lessons we learned from our exercise. We will also show how On2broker overcomes these limitations. Most important is the separation of the query and inference engines and the integration of new web standards like XML and RDF. Dieter Fensel, Jürgen Angele, Stefan Decker, Michael Erdmann, Hans-Peter Schnurr, Rudi Studer, Andreas Witt |
Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. | 4 |
| 1990 | Randomization in robot tasksabstractIt is argued that randomization is a useful primitive for the solution of robot tasks under uncertainty. The author demonstrates a possible application using a standard peg-in-hole problem, focusing on randomization within simple feedback strategies. More generally, randomization may be thought of as an operator that randomly selects between possible knowledge states of actions. In order to synthesize randomized strategies, it is possible to use this operator within the dynamic programming methodology essentially as one would any other operator. It is further asserted that randomization has three important properties: (1) increases the class of solvable tasks; (2) reduces plan brittleness; and (3) simplifies the planning process.> Michael Erdmann |
ICRA | 1 |