Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gou Masuda

dblp:49/1732 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
design patterns
0.011998
Applying Design Patterns to Decision Tree Learning System · SIGSOFT FSE 1998
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning
0.011998
Applying Design Patterns to Decision Tree Learning System · SIGSOFT FSE 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

object-oriented design · 0.0design patterns · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 A Framework for Dynamic Evidence Based Medicine using Data Mining
abstract
Dynamic evidence-based medicine (DEBM) is defined as the process of finding evidence about the care of individual patients automatically and dynamically in those cases when we cannot rely on any literature or guidelines. In this paper, we develop a framework for DEBM using data mining technologies that make it possible to automatically analyze huge clinical databases and to discover patterns behind them. We define the requirements of a data mining system for DEBM. The following functions are required of the system: (1) support for clinical decision making, and (2) discovery of rare patterns which human beings can hardly find. In order to support clinical decision making, rule discovery methods such as association rule mining are applied to this framework. We adopt a post-analysis approach using a rule base and queries. The discovered rules are collected into a rule base for further analysis. By submitting queries to the rule base, users can obtain keys to evidence for making decisions about clinical care. We preliminarily implement a prototype of a rule base and a post-analysis tool based on our framework. This tool can assist users in analyzing the discovered rules.
Gou Masuda, Norihiro Sakamoto, Ryuichi Yamamoto
CBMS1
2002 Mining Diabetes Database With Decision Trees and Association Rules
abstract
Searching for new rules and new knowledge in problem areas, where very little or almost none previous knowledge is present, can be a very long and demanding process. In our research we addressed the problem of finding new knowledge in the form of rules in the diabetes database using a combination of decision trees and association rules. The first question we wanted to answer was, if there are significant differences in sets of rules both approaches produce, and how rules, produced by decision trees behave, after being a subject of filtering and reduction, normally used in association rule approaches. In order to accomplish that, we had to make some modifications to both the decision tree approach and association rule approach. From the first results we can conclude, that the sets of rules, built by decision trees are much smaller than the sets created by association rules. We could also establish, that filtering and reduction did not effect the rules derived from decision trees in the same scale as association rules.
Milan Zorman, Gou Masuda, Peter Kokol, Ryuichi Yamamoto, Bruno Stiglic
CBMS2
1999 Discovering and Visualizing Attribute Associations Using Bayesian Networks and Their Use in KDD
Gou Masuda, Rei Yano, Norihiro Sakamoto, Kazuo Ushijima
PKDD1
1998 Applying Design Patterns to Decision Tree Learning System
abstract
In this paper we describe an application of design patterns to the development of a decision tree learning system. A decision tree learning system constructs a classifier as a form of tree from a given data set. It is required to be as flexible as possible when used in real application domains. Design patterns help us construct reusable software components and construct flexible and extensible systems. The approach employed in this study is as follows. First we examine several decision tree learning systems and identify hot-spots in the systems at points we anticipate future demand for modification and extension of the system. Second we determine which design pattern to apply to each hot-spot. We evaluate the extensibility of the system experimentally. Our experience shows that using design patterns in object-oriented software design allows the easy construction of flexible systems.
Gou Masuda, Norihiro Sakamoto, Kazuo Ushijima
SIGSOFT FSE1
1996 A Practical Object-Oriented Concept Learning System in Clinical Medicine
Gou Masuda, Norihiro Sakamoto, Kazuo Ushijima
IEA/AIE1