EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hugh D. Stewart
dblp:49/2100
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
constraint checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Visual Constraint Diagrams: Runtime Conformance Checking of UML Object Models versus Implementations · ASE 2003 |
Program verification › dynamic verification
runtime verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Visual Constraint Diagrams: Runtime Conformance Checking of UML Object Models versus Implementations · ASE 2003 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Visual Constraint Diagrams: Runtime Conformance Checking of UML Object Models versus Implementations · ASE 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
runtime checking · 0.0constraint diagrams · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Visual Constraint Diagrams: Runtime Conformance Checking of UML Object Models versus ImplementationsabstractThis paper presents visual constraint diagrams (VCD), an extension to UML (Unified Modeling Language) object diagrams for expressing constraints over object models. VCD allows designers to express well-formedness constraints that cannot be expressed using class diagrams alone; an example of such a constraint is that a linked list data structure cannot have any loops. VCD offers two advances over existing techniques: (1) they allow constraints to be expressed within the visual notation of UML, without resorting to complex textual notations such as OCL; and (2) VCD can be checked at runtime, increasing the value of design documents to developers. An editor and a checker for VCD have been implemented as part of the Rosetta software design tool. Christopher J. Turner, T. C. Nicholas Graham, Christopher Wolfe, Julian Ball, David Holman, Hugh D. Stewart, Arthur G. Ryman |
ASE | 6 |