Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Howard Barnum
dblp:49/2176
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0003-2336-6147ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 5 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Computational complexity · 42% Quantum computing and quantum information · 34% Mathematical optimization · 18% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 67% Authentication and access control · 33% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › query complexity › quantum query complexity
adversary method |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003 |
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003 |
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
semidefinite programming formulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003 |
Authentication and access control › authentication
quantum authentication |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
quantum cryptography |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › quantum cryptography
quantum encryption |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum channel capacity |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum error correction
quantum code |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum information theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000 |
Computational geometry › geometric transformation
duality |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003 |
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum entanglement
EPR pairs |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002 |
Information theory
channel capacity |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum channel capacity
classical capacity |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantum information theory · 0.1lower bound · 0.1semidefinite programming · 0.0positive semidefinite matrices · 0.0duality · 0.0fidelity analysis · 0.0encoding restrictions · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Nonclassicality without entanglement enables bit commitmentabstractWe investigate the existence of secure bit commitment protocols in the convex framework for probabilistic theories. The theory makes only minimal assumptions, and can be used to formalize quantum theory, classical probability theory, and a host of other possibilities. We prove that in all such theories that are locally non-classical but do not have entanglement, there exists a bit commitment protocol that is exponentially secure in the number of systems used. Howard Barnum, Oscar C. O. Dahlsten, Matthew Leifer, Ben Toner |
ITW | 1 |
| 2004 | A lower bound on the quantum query complexity of read-once functions
Howard Barnum, Michael E. Saks |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 1 |
| 2003 | Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programmingabstractWe reformulate quantum query complexity in terms of inequalities and equations for a set of positive semidefinite matrices. Using the new formulation we: 1) show that the workspace of a quantum computer can be limited to at most n+k qubits (where n and k are the number of input and output bits respectively) without reducing the computational power of the model; 2) give an algorithm that on input the truth table of a partial Boolean function and an integer t runs in time polynomial in the size of the truth table and estimates, to any desired accuracy, the minimum probability of error that can be attained by a quantum query algorithm attempts to evaluate f in t queries; 3) use semidefinite programming duality to formulate a dual SDP P/spl circ/(f, t, /spl epsi/) that is feasible if and only if f cannot be evaluated within error /spl epsi/ by a t-step quantum query algorithm. Using this SDP, we derive a general lower bound for quantum query complexity that encompasses a lower bound method of Ambainis and its generalizations; 4) give an interpretation of a generalized form of branching in quantum computation. Howard Barnum, Michael E. Saks, Mario Szegedy |
CCC | 1 |
| 2002 | Authentication of Quantum MessagesabstractAuthentication is a well-studied area of classical cryptography: a sender A and a receiver B sharing a classical secret key want to exchange a classical message with the guarantee that the message has not been modified or replaced by a dishonest party with control of the communication line. In this paper we study the authentication of messages composed of quantum states. We give a formal definition of authentication in the quantum setting. Assuming A and B have access to an insecure quantum channel and share a secret, classical random key, we provide a non-interactive scheme that enables A to both encrypt and authenticate an m qubit message by encoding it into m+s qubits, where the error probability decreases exponentially in the security parameter s. The scheme requires a secret key of size 2m+O(s). To achieve this, we give a highly efficient protocol for testing the purity of shared EPR pairs. It has long been known that learning information about a general quantum state will necessarily disturb it. We refine this result to show that such a disturbance can be done with few side effects, allowing it to circumvent cryptographic protections. Consequently, any scheme to authenticate quantum messages must also encrypt them. In contrast, no such constraint exists classically. This reasoning has two important consequences: It allows us to give a lower bound of 2m key bits for authenticating m qubits, which makes our protocol asymptotically optimal. Moreover, we use it to show that digitally signing quantum states is impossible. Howard Barnum, Claude Crépeau, Daniel Gottesman, Adam D. Smith 0001, Alain Tapp |
FOCS | 1 |
| 2000 | On quantum fidelities and channel capacitiesabstractFor the discrete memoryless quantum channel, we show the equivalence of two different notions of quantum channel capacity: that which uses the entanglement fidelity as its criterion for success in transmission, and that which uses the minimum fidelity of pure states in a subspace of the input Hilbert space as its criterion. As a corollary, any source with entropy rate less than the capacity may be transmitted with high entanglement fidelity. We also show that a restricted class of encodings is sufficient to transmit any quantum source which may be transmitted on a given channel. This enables us to simplify a known upper bound for the channel capacity. It also enables us to show that the availability of an auxiliary classical channel from encoder to decoder does not increase the quantum capacity. Howard Barnum, Emanuel Knill, Michael Nielsen 0002 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 1999 | Finding a better-than-classical quantum AND/OR algorithm using genetic programmingabstractThis paper documents the discovery of a new, better-than-classical quantum algorithm for the depth-two AND/OR tree problem. We describe the genetic programming system that was constructed specifically for this work, the quantum computer simulator that is used to evaluate the fitness of evolving quantum algorithms, and the newly discovered algorithm. Lee Spector, Howard Barnum, Herbert J. Bernstein, Nikhil Swamy |
CEC | 2 |