Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Herrmann 0003
dblp:49/2722-3
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-4190-2361ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 75% Automated reasoning and model checking · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum foundations
quantum logic |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Computational Complexity of Quantum Satisfiability · J. ACM 2016 Computational Complexity of Quantum Satisfiability · LICS 2011 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
quantum satisfiability |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Computational Complexity of Quantum Satisfiability · J. ACM 2016 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Computational Complexity of Quantum Satisfiability · J. ACM 2016 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Computational Complexity of Quantum Satisfiability · LICS 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
algebraic complexity · 0.2BSS model · 0.2real computation · 0.1blum-shub-smale model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Computational Complexity of Quantum SatisfiabilityabstractWe connect both discrete and algebraic complexity theory with the satisfiability problem in certain non-Boolean lattices. Specifically, quantum logic was introduced in 1936 by Garrett Birkhoff and John von Neumann as a framework for capturing the logical peculiarities of quantum observables: in the 1D case it coincides with Boolean propositional logic but, starting with dimension two, violates the distributive law. We introduce the weak and strong satisfiability problem for quantum logic propositional formulae. It turns out that in dimension two, both are also NP --complete. For higher-dimensional spaces ℝ d and ℂ d with d ≥ 3 fixed, on the other hand, we show both problems to be complete for the nondeterministic Blum-Shub-Smale (BSS) model of real computation. This provides a unified view on both Turing and real BSS complexity theory, and extends the (still relatively scarce) list of problems established NP ℝ --complete with one, perhaps, closest in spirit to the classical Cook-Levin Theorem. More precisely, strong satisfiability of ∧ ∨ ∧ --terms is complete, while that of ∧ ∨--terms (i.e., those in conjunctive form) can be decided in polynomial time in dimensions d ≥ 2. The decidability of the infinite-dimensional case being still open, we proceed to investigate the case of indefinite finite dimensions. Here, weak satisfiability still belongs to NP R and strong satisfiability is still hard; the latter, in fact, turns out as polynomial-time equivalent to the feasibility of noncommutative integer polynomial equations over matrix rings. Christian Herrmann 0003, Martin Ziegler 0001 |
J. ACM | 1 |
| 2011 | Computational Complexity of Quantum SatisfiabilityabstractQuantum logic generalizes, and in dimension one coincides with, Boolean propositional logic. We introduce the weak and strong satisfiability problem for quantum logic formulas, and show both NP-complete in dimension two as well. For higher-dimensional spaces Rdand Cdwith d≥3 fixed, on the other hand, we show the problem to be complete for the nondeterministic Blum-Shub-Smale model of real computation. This provides a unified view on both Turing and real BSS complexity theory, and adds (a perhaps more natural and combinatorially flavoured) one to the still sparse list of NPR-complete problems, mostly pertaining to real algebraic geometry. Our proofs rely on (a careful examination of) works by John von Neumannas well as contributions by Hagge et. al (2005,2007,2009). We finally investigate the problem over Indefinite finite dimensions and relate it to NON-commutative semi algebraic geometry. Christian Herrmann 0003, Martin Ziegler 0001 |
LICS | 1 |
| 2010 | On the equational theory of projection lattices of finite von Neumann factorsabstractAbstract For a finite von Neumann algebra factor M, the projections form a modular ortholattice L(M). We show that the equational theory of L(M) coincides with that of some resp. all L(ℂn×n ) and is decidable. In contrast, the uniform word problem for the variety generated by all L(ℂn×n) is shown to be undecidable. Christian Herrmann 0003 |
J. Symb. Log. | 1 |
| 2006 | Corrigendum to "On the undecidability of implications between embedded multivalued database dependencies" [Inform. and Comput. 122(1995) 221-235]
Christian Herrmann 0003 |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |