Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jie Peng 0005

dblp:49/2959-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-4021-3668ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 54% Video understanding and tracking · 23% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
dynamic graph neural network
1.722025
TIDFormer: Exploiting Temporal and Interactive Dynamics Makes A Great Dynamic Graph Transformer · KDD (2) 2025
TGB-Seq Benchmark: Challenging Temporal GNNs with Complex Sequential Dynamics · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
sequential dynamics
0.912025
TGB-Seq Benchmark: Challenging Temporal GNNs with Complex Sequential Dynamics · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.912025
TIDFormer: Exploiting Temporal and Interactive Dynamics Makes A Great Dynamic Graph Transformer · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph learning benchmark
0.312025
TGB-Seq Benchmark: Challenging Temporal GNNs with Complex Sequential Dynamics · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-attention · 0.9neighbor sampling · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TGB-Seq Benchmark: Challenging Temporal GNNs with Complex Sequential Dynamics
abstract
Future link prediction is a fundamental challenge in various real-world dynamic systems. To address this, numerous temporal graph neural networks (temporal GNNs) and benchmark datasets have been developed. However, these datasets often feature excessive repeated edges and lack complex sequential dynamics, a key characteristic inherent in many real-world applications such as recommender systems and "Who-To-Follow" on social networks. This oversight has led existing methods to inadvertently downplay the importance of learning sequential dynamics, focusing primarily on predicting repeated edges. In this study, we demonstrate that existing methods, such as GraphMixer and DyGFormer, are inherently incapable of learning simple sequential dynamics, such as "a user who has followed OpenAI and Anthropic is more likely to follow AI at Meta next." Motivated by this issue, we introduce the Temporal Graph Benchmark with Sequential Dynamics (TGB-Seq), a new benchmark carefully curated to minimize repeated edges, challenging models to learn sequential dynamics and generalize to unseen edges. TGB-Seq comprises large real-world datasets spanning diverse domains, including e-commerce interactions, movie ratings, business reviews, social networks, citation networks and web link networks. Benchmarking experiments reveal that current methods usually suffer significant performance degradation and incur substantial training costs on TGB-Seq, posing new challenges and opportunities for future research. TGB-Seq datasets, leaderboards, and example codes are available at https://tgb-seq.github.io/.
Lu Yi 0002, Jie Peng 0005, Yanping Zheng, Fengran Mo, Zhewei Wei, Yuhang Ye 0002, Yue Zixuan, Zengfeng Huang
ICLR2
2025 TIDFormer: Exploiting Temporal and Interactive Dynamics Makes A Great Dynamic Graph Transformer
abstract
Due to the proficiency of self-attention mechanisms (SAMs) in capturing dependencies in sequence modeling, several existing dynamic graph neural networks (DGNNs) utilize Transformer architectures with various encoding designs to capture sequential evolutions of dynamic graphs. However, the effectiveness and efficiency of these Transformer-based DGNNs vary significantly, highlighting the importance of properly defining the SAM on dynamic graphs and comprehensively encoding temporal and interactive dynamics without extra complex modules. In this work, we propose TIDFormer, a dynamic graph TransFormer that fully exploits Temporal and Interactive Dynamics in an efficient manner. We clarify and verify the interpretability of our proposed SAM, addressing the open problem of its uninterpretable definitions on dynamic graphs in previous works. To model the temporal and interactive dynamics, respectively, we utilize the calendar-based time partitioning information and extract informative interaction embeddings for both bipartite and non-bipartite graphs using merely the sampled first-order neighbors. In addition, we jointly model temporal and interactive features by capturing potential changes in historical interaction patterns through a simple decomposition. We conduct extensive experiments on several dynamic graph datasets to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of TIDFormer. The experimental results demonstrate that TIDFormer excels, outperforming state-of-the-art models across most datasets and experimental settings. Furthermore, TIDFormer exhibits significant efficiency advantages compared to previous Transformer-based methods.
Jie Peng 0005, Zhewei Wei, Yuhang Ye 0002
KDD (2)1
2024 Beyond Over-smoothing: Uncovering the Trainability Challenges in Deep Graph Neural Networks
abstract
The drastic performance degradation of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) as the depth of the graph propagation layers exceeds 8-10 is widely attributed to a phenomenon of Over-smoothing. Although recent research suggests that Over-smoothing may not be the dominant reason for such a performance degradation, they have not provided rigorous analysis from a theoretical view, which warrants further investigation In this paper, we systematically analyze the real dominant problem in deep GNNs and identify the issues that these GNNs towards addressing Over-smoothing essentially work on via empirical experiments and theoretical gradient analysis. We theoretically prove that the difficult training problem of deep MLPs is actually the main challenge, and various existing methods that supposedly tackle Over-smoothing actually improve the trainability of MLPs, which is the main reason for their performance gains. Our further investigation into trainability issues reveals that properly constrained smaller upper bounds of gradient flow notably enhance the trainability of GNNs. Experimental results on diverse datasets demonstrate consistency between our theoretical findings and empirical evidence. Our analysis provides new insights in constructing deep graph models.
Jie Peng 0005, Runlin Lei, Zhewei Wei
CIKM1