Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wei Liu 0145

dblp:49/3283-145 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 54% Language models and text generation · 35% Graph learning · 8%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text evaluation
coherence modeling
2.432025
Joint Modeling of Entities and Discourse Relations for Coherence Assessment · EMNLP 2025
Discourse Relation-Enhanced Neural Coherence Modeling · ACL (1) 2025
Modeling Structural Similarities between Documents for Coherence Assessment with Graph Convolutional Networks · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
1.722025
Joint Modeling of Entities and Discourse Relations for Coherence Assessment · EMNLP 2025
Discourse Relation-Enhanced Neural Coherence Modeling · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
discourse relations
0.912025
Discourse Relation-Enhanced Neural Coherence Modeling · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse relation recognition
0.712023
Annotation-Inspired Implicit Discourse Relation Classification with Auxiliary Discourse Connective Generation · ACL (1) 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network
0.712023
Modeling Structural Similarities between Documents for Coherence Assessment with Graph Convolutional Networks · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse relation recognition
implicit discourse relation recognition
0.712023
Annotation-Inspired Implicit Discourse Relation Classification with Auxiliary Discourse Connective Generation · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.512021
Lexicon Enhanced Chinese Sequence Labeling Using BERT Adapter · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.512021
Lexicon Enhanced Chinese Sequence Labeling Using BERT Adapter · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visible matrix · 0.9position-aware attention · 0.9joint modeling · 0.9feature fusion · 0.9scheduled sampling · 0.7graph convolutional network · 0.7discourse connective generation · 0.7lexicon features · 0.5adapter tuning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discourse Relation-Enhanced Neural Coherence Modeling
abstract
Discourse coherence theories posit relations between text spans as a key feature of coherent texts.However, existing work on coherence modeling has paid little attention to discourse relations.In this paper, we provide empirical evidence to demonstrate that relation features are correlated with text coherence.Then, we investigate a novel fusion model that uses position-aware attention and a visible matrix to combine text-and relation-based features for coherence assessment.Experimental results on two benchmarks show that our approaches can significantly improve baselines, demonstrating the importance of relation features for coherence modeling.
Wei Liu 0145, Michael Strube 0001
ACL (1)1
2025 Joint Modeling of Entities and Discourse Relations for Coherence Assessment
abstract
In linguistics, coherence can be achieved by different means, such as by maintaining reference to the same set of entities across sentences and by establishing discourse relations between them.However, most existing work on coherence modeling focuses exclusively on either entity features or discourse relation features, with little attention given to combining the two.In this study, we explore two methods for jointly modeling entities and discourse relations for coherence assessment.Experiments on three benchmark datasets show that integrating both types of features significantly enhances the performance of coherence models, highlighting the benefits of modeling both simultaneously for coherence evaluation.
Wei Liu 0145, Michael Strube 0001
EMNLP1
2024 What Causes the Failure of Explicit to Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition?
abstract
Wei Liu, Stephen Wan, Michael Strube. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Wei Liu 0145, Stephen Wan 0001, Michael Strube 0001
NAACL-HLT1
2023 Annotation-Inspired Implicit Discourse Relation Classification with Auxiliary Discourse Connective Generation
abstract
Implicit discourse relation classification is a challenging task due to the absence of discourse connectives.To overcome this issue, we design an end-to-end neural model to explicitly generate discourse connectives for the task, inspired by the annotation process of PDTB.Specifically, our model jointly learns to generate discourse connectives between arguments and predict discourse relations based on the arguments and the generated connectives.To prevent our relation classifier from being misled by poor connectives generated at the early stage of training while alleviating the discrepancy between training and inference, we adopt Scheduled Sampling to the joint learning.We evaluate our method on three benchmarks, PDTB 2.0, PDTB 3.0, and PCC.Results show that our joint model significantly outperforms various baselines on three datasets, demonstrating its superiority for the task.
Wei Liu 0145, Michael Strube 0001
ACL (1)1
2023 Modeling Structural Similarities between Documents for Coherence Assessment with Graph Convolutional Networks
abstract
Coherence is an important aspect of text quality, and various approaches have been applied to coherence modeling.However, existing methods solely focus on a single document's coherence patterns, ignoring the underlying correlation between documents.We investigate a GCN-based coherence model that is capable of capturing structural similarities between documents.Our model first creates a graph structure for each document, from where we mine different subgraph patterns.We then construct a heterogeneous graph for the training corpus, connecting documents based on their shared subgraphs.Finally, a GCN is applied to the heterogeneous graph to model the connectivity relationships.We evaluate our method on two tasks, assessing discourse coherence and automated essay scoring.Results show that our GCN-based model outperforms all baselines, achieving a new state-of-the-art on both tasks.
Wei Liu 0145, Xiyan Fu, Michael Strube 0001
ACL (1)1
2021 Lexicon Enhanced Chinese Sequence Labeling Using BERT Adapter
abstract
Wei Liu, Xiyan Fu, Yue Zhang, Wenming Xiao. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Wei Liu 0145, Xiyan Fu, Wenming Xiao
ACL/IJCNLP (1)1